[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16650813#comment-16650813
]
Jim Ferenczi commented on LUCENE-8531:
--------------------------------------
(Multi)PhraseQuery-s allows some reordering but the semantic is different from
an unordered span near query.
I don't think we can respect the slop correctly if we continue to use span
queries here. We switched to span queries to avoid searching duplicate terms in
multiple phrase queries but I agree that the behavior is not consistent when
using a slop. Maybe we could switch to the old method of building one phrase
query per path if a slop is used ? This way we could apply the slop to each
phrase query independently. This is more costly than the span method but it
would be semantically correct.
> QueryBuilder hard-codes inOrder=true for generated sloppy span near queries
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8531
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8531
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core/queryparser
> Reporter: Steve Rowe
> Assignee: Steve Rowe
> Priority: Major
>
> QueryBuilder.analyzeGraphPhrase() generates SpanNearQuery-s with passed-in
> phraseSlop, but hard-codes inOrder ctor param as true.
> Before multi-term synonym support and graph token streams introduced the
> possibility of generating SpanNearQuery-s, QueryBuilder generated
> (Multi)PhraseQuery-s, which always interpret slop as allowing reordering
> edits. Solr's eDismax query parser generates phrase queries when its
> pf/pf2/pf3 params are specified, and when multi-term synonyms are used with a
> graph-aware synonym filter, SpanNearQuery-s are generated that require
> clauses to be in order; unlike with (Multi)PhraseQuery-s, reordering edits
> are not allowed, so this is a kind of regression. See SOLR-12243 for edismax
> pf/pf2/pf3 context. (Note that the patch on SOLR-12243 also addresses
> another problem that blocks eDismax from generating queries *at all* under
> the above-described circumstances.)
> I propose adding a new analyzeGraphPhrase() method that allows configuration
> of inOrder, which would allow eDismax to specify inOrder=false. The existing
> analyzeGraphPhrase() method would remain with its hard-coded inOrder=true, so
> existing client behavior would remain unchanged.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
