[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16687085#comment-16687085
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-12965:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit b502ba2882a86958ef8769c3cb2fd65cf2d9c7e1 in lucene-solr's branch
refs/heads/branch_7x from [~gerlowskija]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=b502ba2 ]
SOLR-12965: Add facet support to JsonQueryRequest
> Add JSON faceting support to SolrJ
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12965
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12965
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: clients - java, SolrJ
> Affects Versions: 7.5, master (8.0)
> Reporter: Jason Gerlowski
> Assignee: Jason Gerlowski
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-12965.patch, SOLR-12965.patch, SOLR-12965.patch,
> SOLR-12965.patch
>
>
> SOLR-12947 created {{JsonQueryRequest}}, a SolrJ class that makes it easier
> for users to make JSON-api requests in their Java/SolrJ code. Currently this
> class is missing any sort of faceting capabilities (I'd held off on adding
> this as a part of SOLR-12947 just to keep the issues smaller).
> This JIRA covers adding that missing faceting capability.
> There's a few ways we could handle it, but my first attempt at adding
> faceting support will probably have users specify a Map<String, Object> for
> each facet that they wish to add, similar to how complex queries were
> supported in SOLR-12947. This approach has some pros and cons:
> The benefit is how general the approach is- our interface stays resilient to
> any future changes to the syntax of the JSON API, and users can build facets
> that I'd never thought to explicitly test. The downside is that this doesn't
> offer much abstraction for users who are unfamiliar with our JSON syntax-
> they still have to know the JSON "schema" to build a map representing their
> facet. But in practice we can probably mitigate this downside by providing
> "facet builders" or some other helper classes to provide this abstraction in
> the common case.
> Hope to have a skeleton patch up soon.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
