Hi Erick, > I just noticed that Solr's CHANGES.txt has this at the beginning: > > You need a Java 1.8 VM or later installed. > > Is this still what we want to say between now and whenever we > understand the various failures on jdk 9, 10, 11 and 12? Do we want to > specifically say that 9 and 10 are not recommended?
I think, if you want to use SSL/TLS, the status in Java 11 is undefined. The error rate with Java 11 is higher than with Java 8 to Java 10 (because of support for TLS 1.3 which seem to cause some SSL-related tests to fail). But standard Solr usage is perfectly possible with Java 8 to 11 and actually some of my customers (none of them uses SSL) have already changed without any problems. As far as I see, the HTTP2 branch is also in a good shape (with Java 11), so the statement in the CHANGES.txt and SYSTEM_REQUIREMENTS.txt is in perfect shape. No idea what you are talking about? Why do you think that Java 9 or 10 does not work? On my machines, Smoke tester on Policeman running with Java 9 finished on the first run (it ran tests with both Java 8 and Java 9). SUCCESS! The issues with tests is less Java version than more flakey tests. I cannot see any significance depending on Java version - sorry! Uwe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
