[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Martijn van Groningen updated LUCENE-3354: ------------------------------------------ Attachment: LUCENE-3360.patch Attached initial patch. FieldCache has a new method: {code} FieldCache#getDocTermOrds(reader, field) {code} The DocTermOrdsCreator currently doesn't validate any thing. I'm not sure what it should validate (DocTermsIndex doesn't validate either...). This patch does *not* rely on the patch in LUCENE-3360. Implement LUCENE-3360 properly might take some time. I think issue can be implemented much quicker. > Extend FieldCache architecture to multiple Values > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-3354 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3354 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Bill Bell > > I would consider this a bug. It appears lots of people are working around > this limitation, > why don't we just change the underlying data structures to natively support > multiValued fields in the FieldCache architecture? > Then functions() will work properly, and we can do things like easily > geodist() on a multiValued field. > Thoughts? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org