[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Gregor Kaczor updated SOLR-2710: -------------------------------- Summary: SpellCheckResponse and TermsResponse should implement Serializable (was: SpellCheckResponse and TermsResponse sould implement Serializable) > SpellCheckResponse and TermsResponse should implement Serializable > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: SOLR-2710 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2710 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Build > Affects Versions: 3.3, 4.0 > Reporter: Gregor Kaczor > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 3.4 > > Original Estimate: 1h > Remaining Estimate: 1h > > I am using apache wicket and apache solr. > In wicket i am passing QueryResponse to several classes which worked fine > until I started using SpellChecking. > Wicket is serializing objects in order to store them between requests. > QueryResponse implements Serializable but SpellCheckResponse which is a > member field of QueryResponse does not. This leads to Exceptions. > My question is: > Is there a good reason for SpellCheckResponse (and TermsResponse) not to > implement Serializable? If used, both fields breake the serialisation of > QueryResponse. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org