[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16758658#comment-16758658
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-12999:
-------------------------------------
Woah; why did this land in 8.0 and without a code review? That's a no-no
during a release.
> Index replication could delete segments first
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12999
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12999
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: replication (java)
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: Noble Paul
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 8.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-12999.patch, SOLR-12999.patch
>
>
> Index replication could optionally delete files that it knows will not be
> needed _first_. This would reduce disk capacity requirements of Solr, and it
> would reduce some disk fragmentation when space get tight.
> Solr (IndexFetcher) already grabs the remote file list, and it could see
> which files it has locally, then delete the others. Today it asks Lucene to
> {{deleteUnusedFiles}} at the end. This new mode would probably only be
> useful if there is no SolrIndexSearcher open, since it would prevent the
> removal of files.
> The motivating scenario is a SolrCloud replica that is going into full
> recovery. It ought to not be fielding searches. The code changes would not
> depend on SolrCloud though.
> This option would have some danger the user should be aware of. If the
> replication fails, leaving the local files incomplete/corrupt, the only
> recourse is to try full replication again. You can't just give up and field
> queries.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
