[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16798833#comment-16798833
]
Alan Woodward commented on LUCENE-8733:
---------------------------------------
I think it's reasonable to have them on the public API, which in this case is
the Intervals class and its static factory methods, and IntervalQuery itself.
I don't really like having them on internal classes though, as they're an
implementation detail, and users of intervals shouldn't need to know about them
at all.
> retrospectively add @since javadocs for 'intervals' classes
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8733
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8733
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Christine Poerschke
> Assignee: Christine Poerschke
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-8733-branch-7-4.patch
>
>
> LUCENE-8196 started 'intervals' and subsequent tickets extended it.
> This ticket proposes to retrospectively add {{@since X.Y}} javadocs for all
> the classes (and to then going forward perhaps continue to add them).
> And perhaps we could have an 'intervals' or similar JIRA components choice
> too?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
