[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16798833#comment-16798833
 ] 

Alan Woodward commented on LUCENE-8733:
---------------------------------------

I think it's reasonable to have them on the public API, which in this case is 
the Intervals class and its static factory methods, and IntervalQuery itself.  
I don't really like having them on internal classes though, as they're an 
implementation detail, and users of intervals shouldn't need to know about them 
at all.

> retrospectively add @since javadocs for 'intervals' classes
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-8733
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8733
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: Christine Poerschke
>            Assignee: Christine Poerschke
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LUCENE-8733-branch-7-4.patch
>
>
> LUCENE-8196 started 'intervals' and subsequent tickets extended it.
> This ticket proposes to retrospectively add {{@since X.Y}} javadocs for all 
> the classes (and to then going forward perhaps continue to add them).
> And perhaps we could have an 'intervals' or similar JIRA components choice 
> too?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to