[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16798833#comment-16798833 ]
Alan Woodward commented on LUCENE-8733: --------------------------------------- I think it's reasonable to have them on the public API, which in this case is the Intervals class and its static factory methods, and IntervalQuery itself. I don't really like having them on internal classes though, as they're an implementation detail, and users of intervals shouldn't need to know about them at all. > retrospectively add @since javadocs for 'intervals' classes > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-8733 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8733 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Wish > Reporter: Christine Poerschke > Assignee: Christine Poerschke > Priority: Minor > Attachments: LUCENE-8733-branch-7-4.patch > > > LUCENE-8196 started 'intervals' and subsequent tickets extended it. > This ticket proposes to retrospectively add {{@since X.Y}} javadocs for all > the classes (and to then going forward perhaps continue to add them). > And perhaps we could have an 'intervals' or similar JIRA components choice > too? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org