[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16813351#comment-16813351 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-13369: -------------------------------------------------------- Commit 2533fd1edeb5cccfd835d9999adcd288f98722b5 in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/jira/LUCENE-8738 from Chris M. Hostetter [ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=2533fd1 ] SOLR-13369: disable TriLevelCompositeIdRoutingTest until someone who actually understands how the /bits option is *suppose* to work can assess it to determine if the test is flawed or it there is a bug in the underlying CompositeIdRouter > TriLevelCompositeIdRoutingTest failure: same route prefix maped to multiple > shards > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-13369 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13369 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Reporter: Hoss Man > Priority: Major > Attachments: > TriLevelCompositeIdRoutingTest-failure-with-debug-log.txt, > thetaphi_Lucene-Solr-8.x-Linux_342.log.txt > > > thetaphi's 8x jenkins job just identified a reproducing seed that causes > TriLevelCompositeIdRoutingTest to fail after detecting 2 docs with matching > route prefixes on different shards... > {noformat} > [junit4] 2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test > -Dtestcase=TriLevelCompositeIdRoutingTest -Dtests.method=test > -Dtests.seed=A6B6F0104FE6018F -Dtests.multiplier=3 -Dtests.slow=true > -Dtests.locale=sr-Latn -Dtests.timezone=Pacific/Tongatapu > -Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII > [junit4] FAILURE 9.38s J0 | TriLevelCompositeIdRoutingTest.test <<< > [junit4] > Throwable #1: org.junit.ComparisonFailure: routePrefix > app9/2!user32 found in multiple shards expected:<shard[3]> but was:<shard[2]> > [junit4] > at > __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([A6B6F0104FE6018F:2EE2CFCAE11A6C77]:0) > [junit4] > at > org.apache.solr.cloud.TriLevelCompositeIdRoutingTest.test(TriLevelCompositeIdRoutingTest.java:122) > {noformat} > It's possible this is just a bug I introduced in SOLR-13210 due to a > missunderstanding in how routePrefixes that use a bit mask (ie: {{/2}} in the > assertion failure) are expected to work -- but I thought i had that squared > away based on shalin's feedback in SOLR-13210 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org