[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16821403#comment-16821403
 ] 

Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-13412:
---------------------------------------

[~ab]Yeah, I like that as a way to start it, that makes the most sense since 
we're trying to put all the maintenance things we can into bin/solr.

And to complicate things, there's already a luke target in some of the Solr 
build files, but on a quick glance they're all about getting a compiled version 
of Luke and running _that_. They're currently commented out due to the 
independent Luke project getting out of date. Which is one of the reasons I'm 
so glad that Tomoko put this in the project, we can't get this out of date now.

They'll be a good starting place though.

> Make the Lucene Luke module available from a Solr distribution
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-13412
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13412
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Erick Erickson
>            Assignee: Erick Erickson
>            Priority: Major
>
> Now that [~Tomoko Uchida] has put in a great effort to bring Luke into the 
> project, I think it would be good to be able to access it from a Solr distro.
> I want to go to the right place under the Solr install directory and start 
> Luke up to examine the local indexes. 
> This ticket is explicitly _not_ about accessing it from the admin UI, Luke is 
> a stand-alone app that must be invoked on the node that has a Lucene index on 
> the local filesystem
> We need to 
>  * have it included in Solr when running "ant package". 
>  * add some bits to the ref guide on how to invoke
>  ** Where to invoke it from
>  ** mention anything that has to be installed.
>  ** any other "gotchas" someone just installing Solr should be aware of.
>  * Ant should not be necessary.
>  * ????
>  
> I'll assign this to myself to keep track of, but would not be offended in the 
> least if someone with more knowledge of "ant package" and the like wanted to 
> take it over ;)
> If we can do it at all....



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to