[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16826636#comment-16826636 ]
Tomás Fernández Löbbe commented on SOLR-13420: ---------------------------------------------- commented here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13418?focusedCommentId=16826635 > Allow Routed Aliases to use Collection Properties instead of core properties > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-13420 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13420 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Components: SolrCloud > Affects Versions: master (9.0) > Reporter: Gus Heck > Assignee: Gus Heck > Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-13420.patch > > > The current routed alias code is relying on a core property named > routedAliasName to detect when the Routed Alias wrapper URP should be applied > to Distributed Update Request Processor. > {code:java} > #Written by CorePropertiesLocator > #Sun Mar 03 06:21:14 UTC 2019 > routedAliasName=testalias21 > numShards=2 > collection.configName=_default > ... etc... > {code} > Core properties are not changeable after the core is created, and they are > written to the file system for every core. To support a unit test for > SOLR-13419 I need to create some legacy formatted collection names, and > arrange them into a TRA, but this is impossible due to the fact that I can't > change the core property from the test. There's a TODO dating back to the > original TRA implementation in the routed alias code to switch to collection > properties instead, so this ticket will address that TOD to support the test > required for SOLR-13419. > Back compatibility with legacy core based TRA's and CRA's will of course be > maintained. I also expect that this will facilitate some more nimble handling > or routed aliases with future auto-scaling capabilities such as possibly > detaching and archiving collections to cheaper, slower machines rather than > deleting them. (presently such a collection would still attempt to use the > routed alias if it received an update even if it were no longer in the list > of collections for the alias) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org