[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16840683#comment-16840683
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8757:
-------------------------------------
Hi [~jpountz],
I was going through IndexSearcher code and see that there are no checks that we
do in IndexSearcher to ensure that LeafReaderContexts are ordered by docID.
Should we add those checks while constructing a new instance? I think that can
be orthogonal to this patch, since this patch anyways orders leaf slices by
docIDs. WDYT?
> Better Segment To Thread Mapping Algorithm
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8757
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8757
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Atri Sharma
> Assignee: Simon Willnauer
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: LUCENE-8757.patch, LUCENE-8757.patch, LUCENE-8757.patch,
> LUCENE-8757.patch, LUCENE-8757.patch
>
>
> The current segments to threads allocation algorithm always allocates one
> thread per segment. This is detrimental to performance in case of skew in
> segment sizes since small segments also get their dedicated thread. This can
> lead to performance degradation due to context switching overheads.
>
> A better algorithm which is cognizant of size skew would have better
> performance for realistic scenarios
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
