The artifacts are available, and maven repos have synced up. However,
I had to undertake some unscheduled travel and wasn't able to send out
the announcement and website update today. I'll do this tomorrow.

On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 9:38 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
<ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've reverted SOLR-13449 and proceeding for RC1.
>
> On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 7:35 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:
> >
> > The JWTAuthPluginIntegrationTest.createCollectionUpdateAndQueryDistributed 
> > tests failing rely on polling metrics from all nodes in the cluster, sum 
> > the counts and assert that the count is above a certain threshold. I saw 
> > one test that expected 12 for the authenticated requests counter, but got 
> > only 4. Could it perhaps be that when the client always did 3 or 5 requests 
> > to the nodes to fetch metrics, it would take more time, and now that we get 
> > results on first attempt we may get into timing issues where Metrics store 
> > is not yet updated? Have not checked in depth though.
> >
> > --
> > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> >
> > 7. mai 2019 kl. 15:44 skrev Ishan Chattopadhyaya 
> > <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Jenkins has caught up with what I was seeing: :
> > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-8.1-Linux/296/
> >
> > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 7:08 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> > <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Seems to me that the last moment commit for SOLR-13449 in branch_8_1
> > has resulted in the failure.
> > BTW, I'm not seeing this failure on branch_8x (contrary to what I
> > wrote above; I must've been hallucinating).
> > I'll see if something quick can be done to fix this, otherwise I'll
> > revert this change and spin the RC.
> >
> > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 5:04 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> > <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Seems similar to
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16769078#comment-16769078
> > Looking into it further.
> >
> > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 5:01 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> > <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On my systems (JDK 8), the following test is failing 100% in branch_8x
> > and branch_8_1. Seems like this is not the case in Jenkins.
> >
> > ant -Dtestcase=TestSolrCloudWithHadoopAuthPlugin test
> >
> > Looking into what could be wrong with my system. Has anyone
> > seen/experienced this before?
> >
> > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 3:04 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> > <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > As Đạt mentioned in this issue, nothing more needs to be done for 8.1.
> > I'm starting with the RC building.
> >
> > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 2:58 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> > <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I'll spin the RC as soon as SOLR-13276 is pushed to the branch.
> >
> > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 1:03 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> > <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Provided there are no reproducible failures, I'll spin up an RC in
> > 12-16 hours time.
> >
> > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 5:35 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> > <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > No problem and thanks Uwe!
> >
> > On Fri, 3 May, 2019, 5:33 PM Uwe Schindler, <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> >
> >
> > 8.1 Jobs are running on Jenkins since this morning - sorry for the delay.
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> > -----
> > Uwe Schindler
> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> > https://www.thetaphi.de
> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2019 11:54 AM
> > To: Lucene Dev <dev@lucene.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.1
> >
> > I've cut the release branch, branch_8_1.
> > Seems like I don't have authorization to create a new Jenkins job for
> > 8.1. Can someone with the access please help?
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:48 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> > <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> > I'll cut the release branch in around 12-18 hours.
> > Planning to build the first RC on 2nd May.
> > Thanks and regards,
> > Ishan
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:04 AM Joel Bernstein <joels...@gmail.com>
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > +1 to April 30th timeframe.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:40 PM Erick Erickson
> >
> > <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > 30 Apr seems reasonable to me for cutting the branch.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Apr 18, 2019, at 9:23 AM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> >
> > <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I'm expecting
> > you'd build a RC soon after cutting the branch?
> >
> >
> > Sure, maybe a day or two after the branch cutting.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:51 PM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com>
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > +1 to do a 8.1 soon too, thanks Ishan for volunteering! I'm expecting
> > you'd build a RC soon after cutting the branch?
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 10:08 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> > <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > +1 for a 8.1 soon. I can volunteer for RM.
> > Does 30 April (about 2 weeks from now) sound reasonable for a
> >
> > branch cutting?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 1:14 PM Ignacio Vera
> >
> > <iver...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Feature freeze for 8.0 was long time ago (January 29th) and there
> >
> > is interesting stuff that has not been released yet. In Lucene in particular
> > there is the new BKD tree strategy for segment merging  which provides a
> > significant performance boost for high dimensions, the new Luke module or
> > the new query visitor API for naming a few. I see that in Solr there is as 
> > well
> > quite a few unreleased changes.
> >
> >
> > I might not be able to be the release manager this time as I will be
> >
> > on holidays the next few weeks but I would like to gauge the interest in the
> > community to have a new release soonish.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ignacio
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Adrien
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to