[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16860166#comment-16860166
 ] 

Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-8757:
----------------------------------

git bisect has identified cfd9de894d18888f0f1b9e368994b972a81f449c as the cause 
of the reproducible test failures that have ocured in jenkins jobs on 
branch_8x...

http://fucit.org/solr-jenkins-reports/job-data/thetaphi/Lucene-Solr-8.x-Linux/672/
https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/view/Lucene-Solr/job/Lucene-Solr-8.x-Linux/672/

{noformat}
   [junit4]   2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test  -Dtestcase=TestRegexpRandom2 
-Dtests.method=testRegexps -Dtests.seed=E712F4979E38CFD8 -Dtests.multiplier=3 
-Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=fr-HT -Dtests.timezone=America/New_York 
-Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII
   [junit4] FAILURE 0.07s J1 | TestRegexpRandom2.testRegexps <<<
   [junit4]    > Throwable #1: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Hit 5 
docnumbers don't match
   [junit4]    > Hits length1=25        length2=25
   [junit4]    > hit=0: doc24=1.0,       doc24=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=1: doc33=1.0,       doc33=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=2: doc34=1.0,       doc34=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=3: doc38=1.0,       doc38=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=4: doc43=1.0,       doc43=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=5: doc119=1.0,      doc183=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=6: doc142=1.0,      doc188=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=7: doc146=1.0,      doc193=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=8: doc152=1.0,      doc228=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=9: doc159=1.0,      doc244=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=10: doc163=1.0,     doc250=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=11: doc169=1.0,     doc282=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=12: doc173=1.0,     doc284=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=13: doc183=1.0,     doc291=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=14: doc188=1.0,     doc300=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=15: doc193=1.0,     doc320=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=16: doc228=1.0,     doc347=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=17: doc244=1.0,     doc349=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=18: doc250=1.0,     doc405=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=19: doc282=1.0,     doc418=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=20: doc284=1.0,     doc431=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=21: doc291=1.0,     doc443=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=22: doc300=1.0,     doc490=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=23: doc320=1.0,     doc513=1.0
   [junit4]    > hit=24: doc347=1.0,     doc555=1.0
   [junit4]    > for query:/[)*-|핯Ѿ]*+/
   [junit4]    >        at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([E712F4979E38CFD8:64EB58640929850]:0)
   [junit4]    >        at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:57)
   [junit4]    >        at 
org.apache.lucene.search.CheckHits.checkEqual(CheckHits.java:205)
   [junit4]    >        at 
org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpRandom2.assertSame(TestRegexpRandom2.java:178)
   [junit4]    >        at 
org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpRandom2.testRegexps(TestRegexpRandom2.java:164)
   [junit4]    >        at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
   [junit4]    >        at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
   [junit4]    >        at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
   [junit4]    >        at 
java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:567)
   [junit4]    >        at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:835)

{noformat}
 

> Better Segment To Thread Mapping Algorithm
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-8757
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8757
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Atri Sharma
>            Assignee: Simon Willnauer
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: master (9.0), 8.2
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-8757.patch, LUCENE-8757.patch, LUCENE-8757.patch, 
> LUCENE-8757.patch, LUCENE-8757.patch, LUCENE-8757.patch, LUCENE-8757.patch, 
> LUCENE-8757.patch, LUCENE-8757.patch, LUCENE-8757.patch
>
>
> The current segments to threads allocation algorithm always allocates one 
> thread per segment. This is detrimental to performance in case of skew in 
> segment sizes since small segments also get their dedicated thread. This can 
> lead to performance degradation due to context switching overheads.
>  
> A better algorithm which is cognizant of size skew would have better 
> performance for realistic scenarios



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to