[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16876378#comment-16876378
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8857:
-------------------------------------
[~jpountz] Ran ant test 5 times again: all came in clean:
I have raised a new PR with testGrouping fixes:
[https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/757]
Can we merge it, if it looks fine?
{code:java}
junit4:tophints] 54.39s |
org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.document.TestSuggestField
[junit4:tophints] 16.93s |
org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.DocumentDictionaryTest
[junit4:tophints] 16.63s |
org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.analyzing.FuzzySuggesterTest
[junit4:tophints] 16.42s |
org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.fst.FSTCompletionTest
-check-totals:
common.test:
-check-totals:
test:
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 45 minutes 8 seconds
f01898a404cf:lucene atris$ {code}
> Refactor TopDocs#Merge To Take In Custom Tie Breakers
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8857
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8857
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Atri Sharma
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: master (9.0)
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-8857.patch, LUCENE-8857.patch, LUCENE-8857.patch,
> LUCENE-8857.patch, LUCENE-8857.patch
>
> Time Spent: 4.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In LUCENE-8829, the idea of having lambdas passed in to the API to allow
> finer control over the process was discussed.
> This JIRA tracks adding a parameter to the API which allows passing in
> lambdas to define custom tie breakers, thus allowing users to do custom
> algorithms when required.
> CC: [~jpountz] [~simonw]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
