[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16886058#comment-16886058
]
Ignacio Vera commented on LUCENE-8911:
--------------------------------------
I have my doubts for this change to make 8.2. Elasticsearch CI has reported a
failure that I think it is related with. this change:
{code:java}
ant test -Dtestcase=TestFactories -Dtests.method=test
-Dtests.seed=FEA8D71DFC111060 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.badapples=true
-Dtests.locale=zh-TW -Dtests.timezone=Europe/Guernsey -Dtests.asserts=true
-Dtests.file.encoding=ISO-8859-1{code}
> Backport LUCENE-8778 (improved analysis SPI name handling) to 8.x
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8911
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8911
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: modules/analysis
> Reporter: Tomoko Uchida
> Assignee: Tomoko Uchida
> Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In LUCENE-8907 I reverted LUCENE-8778 from the 8x branch.
> Can we backport it to 8x branch again, with transparent backwards
> compatibility (by emulating the factory loading method of Lucene 8.1)?
> I am not so sure about it would be better or not to backport the changes,
> however, maybe it is good for Solr to have SOLR-13593 without waiting for
> release 9.0.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
