cpoerschke commented on a change in pull request #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second 
grouping step if group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/300#discussion_r321724239
 
 

 ##########
 File path: solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/TestDistributedGrouping.java
 ##########
 @@ -425,6 +426,65 @@ public void test() throws Exception {
     
     //Debug
     simpleQuery("q", "*:*", "rows", 10, "fl", "id," + i1, "group", "true", 
"group.field", i1, "debug", "true");
+    doTestGroupSkipSecondStep();
+  }
+
+  /*
+    SOLR-11831, test skipping the second grouping step if the query only 
retrieves on document per group
+   */
+  private void doTestGroupSkipSecondStep() throws Exception {
+    ignoreException(GroupParams.GROUP_SKIP_DISTRIBUTED_SECOND); // don't print 
stack trace for exception raised by group.skip.second.step
+    // Ignore numFound if group.skip.second.step is enabled because the number 
of documents per group will not be computed (will default to 1)
+    handle.put("numFound", SKIP);
+    query("q", "{!func}id_i1", "rows", 3, "group.skip.second.step", true, 
"group.limit", 1,  "fl",  "id," + i1, "group", "true",
+        "group.field", i1);
+    query("q", "kings", "group.skip.second.step", true, "fl", "id," + i1, 
"group", "true", "group.field", i1);
+    query("q", "{!func}id_i1", "rows", 3, "group.skip.second.step", true,  
"fl",  "id," + i1, "group", "true",
+        "group.field", i1);
+    query("q", "1234doesnotmatchanything1234", "group.skip.second.step", true, 
"fl", "id," + i1, "group", "true", "group.field", i1);
+
+    ignoreException("Illegal grouping specification");
+    // ngroups will return the corrent results, the problem is that numFound 
for each group might be wrong in case of multishard setting - but there is no 
way to
+    // enable/disable it.
+    //assertSimpleQueryThrows("q", "{!func}id_i1", "group.skip.second.step", 
true, "fl", "id," + i1, "group", "true", "group.field", i1, "group.ngroups", 
true);
 
 Review comment:
   The commented upon and commented out test here jumped out. How about 
disallowing `group.ngroups=true` when `group.skip.second.step=true` is used? In 
the multi-shard case the numFound values for each group would be wrong, in the 
single-shard case the numFound values would be right but then in a 
single-sharded setup the usage of distributed grouping would be less likely 
(though not impossible) presumably? 
https://github.com/cpoerschke/lucene-solr/commit/f3d715c5b0ea708c15cace8f889e12e48292d79b
 has a potential code change (but no documentation edit yet).

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to