Sure Christine. Sounds good.

On Tue, 22 Oct, 2019, 9:21 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON), <
cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:

> Would it be okay to include the LUCENE-8996 fix in the RC2 respin?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12983746/LUCENE-8996.patch
>
> Timeline-wise I think it could be committed tomorrow (Wednesday) London
> time.
>
> Christine
>
> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 10/22/19 14:33:40
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.3.0 RC1
>
> This voted has closed. We'll respin RC2 after SOLR-13855 is fixed.
>
> On Tue, 22 Oct, 2019, 6:52 PM jim ferenczi, <jim.feren...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I backported the fix for
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9022 to the 8.3 branch.
>> Thanks Uwe and Ishan.
>>
>>
>> Le mar. 22 oct. 2019 à 15:09, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>>> Okay, Jim. Let's respin and have it included as well.
>>>
>>> On Tue, 22 Oct, 2019, 6:36 PM Uwe Schindler, <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, I would suggest to add this change. It's a big and as the other
>>>> query was already fixed, that's needed for consistency, otherwise you would
>>>> see strange bugs.
>>>>
>>>> Uwe
>>>>
>>>> Am October 22, 2019 12:38:18 PM UTC schrieb jim ferenczi <
>>>> jim.feren...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> If we respin I'd like to include
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9022 that makes all join
>>>>> queries non-eligible for the query cache.
>>>>> The fix is ready and approved so I can backport any time if you are ok
>>>>> with it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Le mar. 22 oct. 2019 à 00:04, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 to re-spin if this can be fixed quickly enough.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 3:30 AM David Smiley <
>>>>>> david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I just discovered this:
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13855  which is in effect
>>>>>> since 8.1, Distributed URP in cloud mode doesn't propagate finish().  I 
>>>>>> see
>>>>>> that Run URP further propagates this to the UpdateLog.  Not doing this
>>>>>> looks concerning to me.  The bug should be easy to fix, which I plan to 
>>>>>> do
>>>>>> if Bar Rotstein doesn't grab it very quickly.  Maybe you/others can
>>>>>> ascertain the seriousness but I want to raise awareness here.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > ~ David Smiley
>>>>>> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
>>>>>> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 1:51 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.3.0
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.3.0-RC1-revd796eca84dbabe3ae9b3c27afc01ef3bee35acb1
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.3.0-RC1-revd796eca84dbabe3ae9b3c27afc01ef3bee35acb1
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> The vote will be open for at least 3 working days, i.e. until
>>>>>> >> 2019-10-24 18:00 UTC.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> [ ] +1  approve
>>>>>> >> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>>>> >> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Here is my +1
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
>>>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to