[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107480#comment-13107480
 ] 

Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-3390 at 9/18/11 5:42 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

The problem is that it's not easy to fix, because the unvalued values BitSet is 
exposed as DocIdSet not Bits like in trunk. The only quick fix is to clone the 
cached values before modifying in setNextReader and leave code unchanged.

Correct fix is to return Bits from getUnvaluedValues and so can do random 
access in compare/compareBottom, FieldComparator code can be copied 1:1 from 
trunk, only small changes needed.

      was (Author: thetaphi):
    The problem is that it's not easy to fix, because the unvalued values 
BitSet is exposed as DocIdSet not Bits like in trunk. The only quick fix is to 
clone the cached values in setNextReader and leave code unchanged.

Correct fix is to return Bits from getUnvaluedValues and so can do random 
access in compare/compareBottom, FieldComparator code can be copied 1:1 from 
trunk, only small changes needed.
  
> Incorrect sort by Numeric values for documents missing the sorting field
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3390
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3390
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core/search
>    Affects Versions: 3.3
>            Reporter: Gilad Barkai
>            Assignee: Doron Cohen
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: double, float, int, long, numeric, sort
>             Fix For: 3.4
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3390.patch, SortByDouble.java
>
>
> While sorting results over a numeric field, documents which do not contain a 
> value for the sorting field seem to get 0 (ZERO) value in the sort. (Tested 
> against Double, Float, Int & Long numeric fields ascending and descending 
> order).
> This behavior is unexpected, as zero is "comparable" to the rest of the 
> values. A better solution would either be allowing the user to define such a 
> "non-value" default, or always bring those document results as the last ones.
> Example scenario:
> Adding 3 documents, 1st with value 3.5d, 2nd with -10d, and 3rd without any 
> value.
> Searching with MatchAllDocsQuery, with sort over that field in descending 
> order yields the docid results of 0, 2, 1.
> Asking for the top 2 documents brings the document without any value as the 
> 2nd result - which seems as a bug?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to