I am about to re-read the rules here but I think this is a procedural vote.
Also, considering almost all procedural changes would impact the code in some way, I don't think anything would pass if we were to put stuff in the "code modification" category as getting a single veto would stop all progress. -Anshum On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:17 PM Atri Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > I would argue against that — this is more of a project level decision with > no changes to the core code base per se — more of restructuring of it. Sort > of how a sub project becomes a TLP. > > On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 00:38, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> This is in the code modification category, since code will be modified as >> result of this proposal. >> >> On Wed, 13 May, 2020, 12:27 am Shawn Heisey, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 5/12/2020 1:36 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote: >>> > According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am >>> > calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache >>> > project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two >>> > independent entities. >>> >>> +1 (pmc) >>> >>> We should clarify exactly what kind of vote this is. If it is in the >>> "code modification" category, then a single -1 vote would be enough to >>> defeat the proposal. There are already some -1 votes. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Shawn >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> -- > Regards, > > Atri > Apache Concerted > -- Anshum Gupta
