Is there a way to see the failures and their logs? On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 12:02 AM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This week is a significant improvement. Short form: > > > Raw fail count by week totals, most recent week first (corresponds to bits): > Week: 0 had 68 failures > Week: 1 had 113 failures > Week: 2 had 103 failures > Week: 3 had 102 failures > > > ********Failures in Hoss' reports for the last 4 rollups. > > There were 273 unannotated tests that failed in Hoss' rollups. Ordered by the > date I downloaded the rollup file, newest->oldest. See above for the dates > the files were collected > These tests were NOT BadApple'd or AwaitsFix'd > > Failures in the last 4 reports.. > Report Pct runs fails test > 0123 3.1 1601 41 BasicDistributedZkTest.test > 0123 1.7 1495 28 MultiThreadedOCPTest.test > 0123 1.0 1587 14 RollingRestartTest.test > 0123 3.1 1653 55 > ScheduledTriggerIntegrationTest.testScheduledTrigger > 0123 1.3 1574 13 SystemCollectionCompatTest.testBackCompat > 0123 1.6 1571 14 TestPackages.testPluginLoading > 0123 0.3 1570 7 > TestQueryingOnDownCollection.testQueryToDownCollectionShouldFailFast > ******************************************** > > =====================SuppressWarnings====================== > > In the attached report there’s a new section counting SuppressWarnings. For > the nonce, ignore it. Eventually, when all the warnings are fixed or > suppressed, I will be advocating for _not_ introducing new warnings at least > on Master. To encourage this, I want un-suppressed warnings to become > compile-time errors. > > That’ll tempt people to just add @SuppressWarnings, and I don’t think that’s > a proper fix, so the BadApple report will flag files that have more > @SuppressWarnings than they did last week and I’ll complain ;) There’ll be > exceptions of course... > > Yes, that flies counter to the zillion SuppressWarnings I’m putting in the > code right now, but I’m not about to try to fix on the order of 5,000 > warnings in our code all at once. that’s where the SuppressWarnings data is > coming from in the attached report, I expect the counts to increase until we > get clean compilations. Martin Fowler talks about rewriting working code for > no good reason being a bad idea in “Refactoring”... > > My goal currently is to get the compilations clean, stop getting worse, and > then we can make things better. Along about 2040, all the code that currently > has SuppressWarnings will have been rewritten and they’ll all be gone... > > ================================== > Full report: > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
-- ----------------------------------------------------- Noble Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org