Is there a way to see the failures and their logs?

On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 12:02 AM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This week is a significant improvement. Short form:
>
>
> Raw fail count by week totals, most recent week first (corresponds to bits):
> Week: 0  had  68 failures
> Week: 1  had  113 failures
> Week: 2  had  103 failures
> Week: 3  had  102 failures
>
>
> ********Failures in Hoss' reports for the last 4 rollups.
>
> There were 273 unannotated tests that failed in Hoss' rollups. Ordered by the 
> date I downloaded the rollup file, newest->oldest. See above for the dates 
> the files were collected
> These tests were NOT BadApple'd or AwaitsFix'd
>
> Failures in the last 4 reports..
>    Report   Pct     runs    fails           test
>      0123   3.1     1601     41      BasicDistributedZkTest.test
>      0123   1.7     1495     28      MultiThreadedOCPTest.test
>      0123   1.0     1587     14      RollingRestartTest.test
>      0123   3.1     1653     55      
> ScheduledTriggerIntegrationTest.testScheduledTrigger
>      0123   1.3     1574     13      SystemCollectionCompatTest.testBackCompat
>      0123   1.6     1571     14      TestPackages.testPluginLoading
>      0123   0.3     1570      7      
> TestQueryingOnDownCollection.testQueryToDownCollectionShouldFailFast
> ********************************************
>
> =====================SuppressWarnings======================
>
> In the attached report there’s a new section counting SuppressWarnings. For 
> the nonce, ignore it. Eventually, when all the warnings are fixed or 
> suppressed, I will be advocating for _not_ introducing new warnings at least 
> on Master. To encourage this, I want un-suppressed warnings to become 
> compile-time errors.
>
> That’ll tempt people to just add @SuppressWarnings, and I don’t think that’s 
> a proper fix, so the BadApple report will flag files that have more 
> @SuppressWarnings than they did last week and I’ll complain ;) There’ll be 
> exceptions of course...
>
> Yes, that flies counter to the zillion SuppressWarnings I’m putting in the 
> code right now, but I’m not about to try to fix on the order of 5,000 
> warnings in our code all at once. that’s where the SuppressWarnings data is 
> coming from in the attached report, I expect the counts to increase until we 
> get clean compilations. Martin Fowler talks about rewriting working code for 
> no good reason being a bad idea in “Refactoring”...
>
> My goal currently is to get the compilations clean, stop getting worse, and 
> then we can make things better. Along about 2040, all the code that currently 
> has SuppressWarnings will have been rewritten and they’ll all be gone...
>
> ==================================
> Full report:
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to