meh forgot that images get stripped... it shows 3 other places where the same <<# syntax for an anchor is used...
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 2:42 PM Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote: > I've verified all the versions for gems mentioned in README.adoc > > * HTML version, using Jekyll: > ** `Ruby` (v2.3 or higher) > ** The following gems must be installed: > *** `jekyll`: v3.5, not v4.x. > Use `gem install jekyll --force --version 3.5.0` to force install of v3.5.0. > *** `jekyll-asciidoc`: v2.1 or higher; latest version (3.0.0) is fine. > Use `gem install jekyll-asciidoc` to install. > *** `slim`: v3.0 or higher; latest version (4.0.1) is fine. > Use `gem install slim` to install. > *** `tilt`: v1.0 or higher; latest version (2.0.10) is fine. > Use `gem install tilt` to install. > *** `concurrent-ruby`: v1.0 or higher; latest version (1.1.5) is fine. > Use `gem install concurrent-ruby` to install. > > ruby 2.4.2p198 (2017-09-14 revision 59899) [x86_64-darwin16] > jekyll (3.5.0) > jekyll-asciidoc (2.1.1, 2.1.0) > slim (3.0.9) > tilt (2.0.9) > concurrent-ruby (1.1.6) > > Even so I seem to get this on 8x: > > build-site: > [java] Relative link points at id that doesn't exist in dest: > the-standard-query-parser.html#differences-between-lucenes-classic-query-parser-and-solrs-standard-query-parser > [java] ... source: > file:/Users/gus/projects/apache/lucene-solr/fork/ant8/lucene-solr/solr/build/solr-ref-guide/html-site/common-query-parameters.html > [java] Relative link points at id that doesn't exist in dest: > #differences-between-lucenes-classic-query-parser-and-solrs-standard-query-parser > [java] ... source: > file:/Users/gus/projects/apache/lucene-solr/fork/ant8/lucene-solr/solr/build/solr-ref-guide/html-site/the-standard-query-parser.html > [java] Processed 2674 links (1979 relative) to 3506 anchors in 263 > files > [java] Total of 2 problems found > > This is easily fixed via the anchor syntax shown here: > https://asciidoctor.org/docs/asciidoc-syntax-quick-reference/#links but > I'm baffled as to why seemingly identical syntax fails in one place but not > the other (length limit issue? is this just me?) > [image: Screen Shot 2020-07-27 at 2.33.47 PM.png] > > -- > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) > http://www.the111shift.com (play) > -- http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) http://www.the111shift.com (play)
