On 21.09.2011 21:40, Michael Herndon wrote:
@all,
I updated the build scripts to increase it's granularity.
https://cwiki.apache.org/LUCENENET/build-system-scripts.html
Similarity was include, though are there any tests for this project ?
Some of the contrib tests are failing, I saw a few in Contrib.Highlighter
just glancing at the output .
The Highlighter tests are probably failing due to a
missing
SetMultiTermRewriteMethod(MultiTermQuery.SCORING_BOOLEAN_QUERY_REWRITE):
https://github.com/robert-j/lucene.net/commit/a4cdf4bb613770913af1bf9d546d6499bed452bf
Robert
I recieved some feedback Eric Woodruff. It looks like SHFB& Sandcastle
generate a plain file html, its been staring me in the face this whole time.
I'll need to build in some targets that extract whats needed to push to
site branch. Then I'll start working on nuget.
@Prescott,
Can the volatile fields be wrapped in a lock statement and code that access
those fields with replaced with call to a property /method that wraps access
to that field?
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Troy Howard<thowar...@gmail.com> wrote:
I thought it was:
2.9.2 and before are 2.0 compatible
2.9.4 and before are 3.5 compatible
After 2.9.4 are 4.0 compatible
Thanks,
Troy
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Michael Herndon
<mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
if thats the case, then well need conditional statements for including
ThreadLocal<T>
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Prescott Nasser<geobmx...@hotmail.com
wrote:
I thought this was after 2.9.4
Sent from my Windows Phone
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Herndon
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 8:30 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
@Robert,
I believe the overwhelming consensus on the mailing list vote was to
move
to
.NET 4.0 and drop support for previous versions.
I'll take care of build scripts issue while they being refactored into
smaller chunks this week.
@Troy, Agreed.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Robert Jordan<robe...@gmx.net> wrote:
On 20.09.2011 23:48, Prescott Nasser wrote:
Hey all seems like we are set with 2.9.4? Feedback has been positive
and
its been quiet. Do we feel ready to vote for a new release?
I don't know if the build infrastructure is part of the
release. If yes, then there is an open issue:
Contrib doesn't build right now because there
are some assembly name mismatches between certain *.csproj
files and build/scripts/contrib.targets.
The following patches should fix the issue:
https://github.com/robert-j/**lucene.net/commit/**
c5218bca56c19b3407648224781eec**7316994a39<
https://github.com/robert-j/lucene.net/commit/c5218bca56c19b3407648224781eec7316994a39
https://github.com/robert-j/**lucene.net/commit/**
50bad187655d59968d51d472b57c2a**40e201d663<
https://github.com/robert-j/lucene.net/commit/50bad187655d59968d51d472b57c2a40e201d663
Also, the fix for [LUCENENET-358] is basically making
Lucene.Net.dll a .NET 4.0-only assembly:
https://github.com/apache/**lucene.net/commit/**
23ea6f52362fc7dbce48fd012cea12**9a7350c73c<
https://github.com/apache/lucene.net/commit/23ea6f52362fc7dbce48fd012cea129a7350c73c
Did we agree about abandoning .NET<= 3.5?
Robert
