I think you need a sort of ‘ordered atLeast’ here. Currently atLeast() is a mixture of a disjunction and an unordered interval, it should be possible to add something that adds additional constraints to the sets that it finds. I think you’d need to write some code though, I can’t see a way of doing it with the current group of interval operators.
> On 17 Sep 2020, at 14:20, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hmm... Is there any way to express a query for a phrase-like sequence of > tokens: > > a b c d > > but with potential "holes" (one or more terms missing): > > - b c d > a - c d > a b - d > ... > > I've experimented with ordered(term("a"), term(b), ...), gaps and > atLeast but I can't get it to work. I could expand terms into several > queries manually but the number of potential subsets is quite large, > hence the question. Thanks for tips. > > Dawid > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org