When I said temporary, I meant 3-4 hours. Definitely not more than that.

IMO we should just roll back offending commits if they are easily
identifiable. I agree with you — we all have been guilty of breaking builds
(mea culpa as well). The bad part here is the longevity of the failures.


On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 21:05, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> bq. IMO if a temporary instability is to be introduced deliberately, it
> should be published on the list
>
>
>
> Actually, I disagree. Having anything in the tests that fail 100% of the
> time is just unacceptable since it becomes a barrier for everyone else.
> AFAIK, if the problem can be identified to a particular push, I have no
> problems with that push being unilaterally rolled back.
>
>
>
> The exception for me is when the problem is addressed immediately, I’ve
> certainly been the source of that kind of problem, as have others.
>
>
>
> What I take great exception to is the fact that some of these tests have
> been failing 100% of the time for the last seven days! If it’s the case
> that the full test suite was never run before the push that’s another
> discussion. Yeah, it takes a long time but…
>
>
>
> Erick
>
>
>
> > On Sep 18, 2020, at 11:28 AM, Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > IMO if a temporary instability is to be introduced deliberately, it
> should be published on the list. If it’s inadvertently added, we either fix
> it within an hour or so or revert the offending commit.
>
> >
>
> > On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 20:26, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > http://fucit.org/solr-jenkins-reports/failure-report.html
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > HdfsAutoAddReplicasTest failing 100% of the time.
>
> >
>
> > TestPackages.classMethod failing 100% of the time
>
> >
>
> > 3-4 AutoAddReplicas tests failing 98% of the time.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Is anyone looking at these? I realize the code base is changing a lot,
> and some temporary instability is to be expected. What I’d like is for some
> indication that people are actively addressing these.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Erick
>
> >
>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >
>
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>
> >
>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> > Regards,
>
> >
>
> > Atri
>
> > Apache Concerted
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
> --
Regards,

Atri
Apache Concerted

Reply via email to