+1 @David Smiley On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 4:07 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Maybe we need them for kerberos? I'm totally fine getting rid of kerberos > support from Solr core some day, but it might not be very easy to refactor it > into a package. > > On Sat, 10 Oct, 2020, 10:26 pm David Smiley, <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> I think that historically, we are good at adding code but not good at >> removing code. We add new ways to do things but keep the old. Removal is >> more work often forgotten but doing nothing implicitly adds technical debt >> henceforth. >> >> With that segue... given that our latest SolrClient implementations are >> based on Jetty HttpClient (to support Http2 but should support 1.1?), do we >> need the original Apache HttpComponents/HttpClient as well? This is an >> honest question... maybe there are subtle reasons they are needed and I >> think it would be good as a project that we are clear on them. >> >> ~ David Smiley >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
-- ----------------------------------------------------- Noble Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
