Ah yeah, that was my bad ... missed some code in the backport to 8x. Fix is
in but needs a re-spin :-( Thanks for reporting / verifying Anshum & Mike

Cheers,
Tim

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 3:42 PM Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote:

> -1
>
> I have been able to reproduce the regression that Anshum found, and would
> like to change my vote accordingly.
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 4:31 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15097
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 2:28 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> While testing the artifacts some more, I realized that the cluster graph
>>> doesn't show up on the admin UI any more.
>>>
>>> I started the cluster with -e cloud -noprompt, and the getting started
>>> collection was created successfully. The clusterstate, as well as the admin
>>> UI confirm that.
>>>
>>> I also tried creating a collection using the admin API, which was
>>> successful, but the graph didn't reflect that either.
>>>
>>> I've tested this using both Safari and Firefox, and it's clearly not a
>>> browser issue.
>>>
>>> Considering that the users rely on the graph, I think we might need to
>>> fix and respin this.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:51 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0
>>>>
>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC1-rev737cb9c49b08f6e3964c1e8a80132da3c764e027
>>>>
>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>
>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC1-rev737cb9c49b08f6e3964c1e8a80132da3c764e027
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2021-01-22 17:00
>>>> UTC.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>
>>>> Here is my +1
>>>> ----
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>

Reply via email to