On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 4:01 AM Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It's all an intellectual exercise though. I consider the initial > performance drop on small cache windows a nice, cheap, win. Increasing > the cache leads to other problems that may sting later (gc activity, > memory consumption on multiple parallel threads, etc.). > > Is that because of stopwords that aren't being removed? I guess what I'm asking is, for this test is n=20 enough? :) If so, leads to many other potential solutions (without caches). Also it would suggest the benchmark might be a bit too biased.
