Looks like the latest changes did the trick - the smoke-release job passed overnight: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.9/7/
Sorry to block you for a bit Mayya; good luck with the rest of the release! Jason On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:07 AM Jason Gerlowski <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey all, > > Quick update: I've removed the javax.annotation dependency declaration > that the build didn't like. Precommit and tests pass. I've pushed > the fix to branch_8_9. I'm currently running buildAndPushRelease.py + > smoke-tester and will give the all-clear once I see that pass. > > Sorry to hold things up on the release! > > Jason > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 4:17 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I've opened https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2509 for the v8.10.0 > > > v8.9.0 comparison issue. Hope that helps. > > > > From: [email protected] At: 06/08/21 01:28:25 UTC+1:00 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.x - Build # 220 > > - Still Failing! > > > > Thanks Robert for the explanation. > > > > Jason, thank you for your reply and investigations. > > > > > Do you happen to have the command that reproduced this for you? > > You can see the build failures in Jenkins. The last 3 failures were after > > June 2nd, and all contained similar failures about sheisty classes in solr. > > > > About specific RC for the smoke-tester, I think you can first build a > > release locally with buildAndPushRelease.py script, and then use this local > > release for the smoke tester. > > > > I've also looked at the failure on 8.x branch: "Future release 8.9.0 is > > greater than 8.10.0", and it looks like smokeTestRelease.py fails to > > correctly compare v8.10.0 > v8.9.0, as (('8', '10', '0') < ('8', '9', '0')). > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 3:24 PM Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Sheisty means classes that collide with jdk packages. E.g. this > >> javax.annotation looks like a problem, as it collides with existing > >> jdk package in an xml module: > >> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/javax/annotation/package-summary.html > >> > >> Looks like the whole jar being used here is archived/deprecated [1] in > >> favor of "jakarta annotations" [2] which uses a new > >> non-colliding/jar-helling "jakarta.annotation" package/module: > >> > >> 1. https://github.com/javaee/javax.annotation/ > >> 2. https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/common-annotations-api > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> M > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 2:59 PM Jason Gerlowski <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hey Mayya, > >> > > >> > My "fix" on branch_8x is already present in 8.9: see > >> > c461c506ffc02d4f3d16c7a0b0ec4250ba79fb7d from June 2nd. Evidently > >> > there's still other problems though. > >> > > >> > I'll look into this on my end for sure. Do you happen to have the > >> > command that reproduced this for you? Or understand what "sheisty" > >> > means here haha? > >> > > >> > Jason > >> > > >> > On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 1:12 PM Mayya Sharipova > >> > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > Hello Jason, > >> > > thanks for the update. > >> > > > >> > > While trying to build a release candidate and doing the smoke test, I > >> > > am getting the following error: > >> > > RuntimeError: JAR file > >> > > "../.lucene-releases/8.9.0/RC1/smoketest/unpack/solr-8.9.0/contrib/gcs-repository/lib/javax.annotation-api-1.3.2.jar" > >> > > contains sheisty class > >> > > "javax/annotation/sql/DataSourceDefinitions.class" > >> > > > >> > > I guess we would need to backport your changes to branch_8_9 as well. > >> > > Would it be possible for you to do this? > >> > > > >> > > I will look into how to fix another error about "Future release 8.9.0 > >> > > is greater than 8.10.0". > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 7:54 AM Jason Gerlowski <[email protected]> > >> > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> I pushed a commit to branch_8x yesterday that I expect has fixed this. > >> > >> The 'generate-maven-artifacts' task now succeeds for me locally at > >> > >> least. > >> > >> > >> > >> The Jenkins job failed in the overnight run, but it looks to be a > >> > >> consequence of the release process that Mayya has in flight: > >> > >> > >> > >> "RuntimeError: Future release 8.9.0 is greater than 8.10.0 in > >> > >> file:///home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.x/lucene/build/smokeTestRelease/dist/lucene/changes/Changes.html" > >> > >> > >> > >> If anyone sees the "gcs-repository" related error message crop up > >> > >> anywhere else, please let me know. > >> > >> > >> > >> Jason > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 7:55 AM Jason Gerlowski > >> > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Hey all, > >> > >> > > >> > >> > This is my fault. Will look at fixing it this morning. Sorry for > >> > >> > the > >> > >> > disruption! > >> > >> > > >> > >> > If this is blocking anyone, let me know and I'll revert the > >> > >> > offending > >> > >> > commit while I investigate the cause. Otherwise I'll just leave it > >> > >> > as-is and push to have a fix as soon as I can. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Jason > >> > >> > > >> > >> > On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 8:35 PM Robert Muir <[email protected]> > >> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > The latest 8.x failure seems to be related to POM files from solr > >> > >> > > gcs > >> > >> > > repository. I don't currently know what is needed to move this > >> > >> > > along. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 8:28 PM Apache Jenkins Server > >> > >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > Build: > >> > >> > > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.x/220/ > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > No tests ran. > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > Build Log: > >> > >> > > > [...truncated 28456 lines...] > >> > >> > > > BUILD FAILED > >> > >> > > > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.x/build.xml:431: > >> > >> > > > The following error occurred while executing this line: > >> > >> > > > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.x/solr/build.xml:685: > >> > >> > > > The following error occurred while executing this line: > >> > >> > > > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.x/solr/build.xml:664: > >> > >> > > > The following error occurred while executing this line: > >> > >> > > > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.x/solr/common-build.xml:471: > >> > >> > > > The following error occurred while executing this line: > >> > >> > > > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.x/lucene/common-build.xml:1767: > >> > >> > > > The following error occurred while executing this line: > >> > >> > > > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.x/lucene/common-build.xml:682: > >> > >> > > > Unable to initialize POM pom.xml: Could not find the model > >> > >> > > > file > >> > >> > > > '/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.x/lucene/build/poms/solr/contrib/gcs-repository/pom.xml'. > >> > >> > > > for project unknown > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > Total time: 7 minutes 13 seconds > >> > >> > > > Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure > >> > >> > > > Setting JDK_1_9_LATEST_HOME=/home/jenkins/tools/java/latest1.9 > >> > >> > > > Email was triggered for: Failure - Any > >> > >> > > > Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any > >> > >> > > > Setting JDK_1_9_LATEST_HOME=/home/jenkins/tools/java/latest1.9 > >> > >> > > > Setting JDK_1_9_LATEST_HOME=/home/jenkins/tools/java/latest1.9 > >> > >> > > > Setting JDK_1_9_LATEST_HOME=/home/jenkins/tools/java/latest1.9 > >> > >> > > > Setting JDK_1_9_LATEST_HOME=/home/jenkins/tools/java/latest1.9 > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
