Looks like just LUCENE-9334 remains? On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:18 PM Julie Tibshirani <juliet...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello everyone! I will pick up LUCENE-9908. > > > I had marked LUCENE-9583 as a blocker but I'm on board with removing its > blocker status given we can make changes later. I hope to come back to the > issue soon with some ideas. > > > Julie > > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:42 PM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I agree that we can remove the blocker status from LUCENE-9583 and take >> advantage of the fact that these new APIs are experimental to improve things >> later. >> >> For the renaming issue, maybe we could just make vectors plural for now for >> consistency and revisit other options later. >> >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:21 PM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Adrien; I plan to tackle LUCENE-9905. >>> >>> I don't have ideas about how to move forward on LUCENE-9583; I spent >>> significant amount of time trying various permutations on that API, >>> and what we have was the best compromise I could find at the time, so >>> I'm not sure I agree it's a Blocker, yet I'm open to improvements. >>> Maybe Julie will propose something? >>> >>> There is also a vector-related renaming issue Tomoko had opened, which >>> I thought was marked Blocker, but I guess no longer is. Previously I >>> had hoped to get some strong consensus, but that proved challenging. >>> Given that, I'm OK leaving things as-is, marking these apis >>> @experimental and potentially revisiting naming issues later, eg once >>> we have a second vector ANN implementation. >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:07 AM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi Mike, >>> > >>> > Here's what I know about the remaining blockers: >>> > >>> > LUCENE-9908 - Move VectorValues#search to VectorReader and LeafReader >>> > This was discussed on the mailing list and it looks like there was >>> > agreement on making that change. If someone has cycles and can take it, >>> > please go ahead, otherwise I'll try to allocate some time to it. I'm >>> > expecting this change to be rather straightforward. >>> > >>> > LUCENE-9905 - Revise approach to specifying NN algorithm >>> > This is a change to how we've been thinking about configuring the ANN >>> > algorithm. I don't know if someone plans to work on it. >>> > >>> > LUCENE-9583 - How should we expose VectorValues.RandomAccess >>> > We'd like to get rid of this sub interface, but I'm not the best person >>> > to comment on how much work this needs. Maybe Mike S or Julie can give >>> > more info. >>> > >>> > LUCENE-9334 - Require consistency between data-structures on a per-field >>> > basis >>> > Mayya has been working on this one and it's very close. >>> > >>> > LUCENE-9047 - Directory APIs should be little endian >>> > Ignacio and Julie have been working on this one and it is close as well. >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 10:59 PM Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Michael, did you get a chance to mark the issues you were thinking of as >>> >> blockers? >>> >> >>> >> Adrien, I see that the remaining open blockers look mostly like your >>> >> open issues. Two of them have recent activity, but LUCENE-9047 would >>> >> need to be brought back to the lucene repo. Is this an accurate view of >>> >> the state of things? >>> >> >>> >> Now that I'm done with 8.8.2, I would love to see how we can continue to >>> >> make headway on 9.0! >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 3:25 PM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> There has been some discussion around a few code visibility and naming >>> >>> issues related to "VectorFormat" as it is called today. I'd like to >>> >>> get that sorted out before 9.0 - I'll hunt up the ticket(s) and mark >>> >>> as blockers >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 11:02 AM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Hello Jan, >>> >>> > >>> >>> > The list of blockers should be mostly up-to-date: >>> >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9661?jql=project%3D%22Lucene%20-%20Core%22%20and%20priority%3DBlocker%20and%20fixVersion%3D%22main%20(9.0)%22. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 7:21 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> >>> >>> > wrote: >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Hi, >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Where are we at with the Lucene 9.0 release planning? >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> The git split is largely done. Not sure about the build. >>> >>> >> Let's update the umbrella issue >>> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9375 for known >>> >>> >> remaining cleanup tasks. >>> >>> >> The one on that list is releaseWizard, but as Adrien says there are >>> >>> >> also other scripts that need updating. >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Jan >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> 13. jan. 2021 kl. 15:10 skrev Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> +1 to start planning 9.0. >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Since you mentioned the Gradle build, I believe that we still need >>> >>> >> to migrate some of the release tooling from Ant to Gradle, e.g. >>> >>> >> dev-tools/scripts/addBackcompatIndexes.py. These scripts are not >>> >>> >> easy to test without actually doing a release so the 9.0 RM might >>> >>> >> have some debugging to do. >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:17 PM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> >>> >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi everyone, as we head into a new year full of optimism, is it time >>> >>> >>> to start discussing the next major release? We released 8.0 on Jun >>> >>> >>> 18, >>> >>> >>> 2019, over 18 months ago. Since then we've switched to a >>> >>> >>> gradle-based >>> >>> >>> build. We have added vector-valued fields and an HNSW neighbor >>> >>> >>> search >>> >>> >>> algorithm for them. At the same time Solr has been getting a major >>> >>> >>> overhaul which should justify a release, I think? IIRC there was >>> >>> >>> talk >>> >>> >>> of making 9.0 be the first release of Solr as its own TLP. Is it >>> >>> >>> time >>> >>> >>> to start planning for that now? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -Mike >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> -- >>> >>> >> Adrien >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > -- >>> >>> > Adrien >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Adrien >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >> >> >> -- >> Adrien
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
