I think since Tim is out on vacation, it's probably not too late. That looks like a good fix to have, do we know how long the bug has been present?
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 7:56 AM Mayya Sharipova <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote: > Hello everyone, > We have discovered a bug and fixed a bug in Lucene sort optimization > <https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/300> (LUCENE-10106) and would like > to merge it to Lucene 8.10 if it is not too late. > I apologize for the inconvenience, the bug was discovered just yesterday. > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 9:26 PM Timothy Potter <thelabd...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Ahem ... unfortunately there will not be an 8.10 RC this week. I'm >> headed out on vacation tomorrow, back at keys on Monday, Sept 20 >> unless someone else wants to pick up the RM duties before then? >> >> After failing the test suite at various places and other weirdness >> like .asc files not getting created, I finally got to the smoke test >> part, which is now failing with: >> >> File >> "/Users/tjp/.lucene-releases/8.10.0/lucene-solr/dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", >> line 176, in checkJARMetaData >> raise RuntimeError('%s is missing "%s" inside its >> META-INF/MANIFEST.MF (wrong git revision?)' % \ >> RuntimeError: JAR file >> >> "/Users/tjp/.lucene-releases/8.10.0/RC1/smoketest/unpack/lucene-8.10.0/benchmark/lucene-benchmark-8.10.0.jar" >> is missing "Implementation-Version: 8.10.0 >> ecf5c747e6df418dd05a18af327c20051f0584d7" inside its >> META-INF/MANIFEST.MF (wrong git revision?) >> >> FWIW, I verified that the other Lucene JAR files have this line in >> them, such as core: >> >> Manifest-Version: 1.0 >> Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.9.15 >> Created-By: 1.8.0_265-b01 (AppleJDK-8.0.265.1.1) >> Extension-Name: org.apache.lucene >> Specification-Title: Lucene Search Engine: core >> Specification-Version: 8.10.0 >> Specification-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation >> Implementation-Title: org.apache.lucene >> Implementation-Version: 8.10.0 ecf5c747e6df418dd05a18af327c20051f0584d >> 7 - tjp - 2021-09-14 19:08:42 >> Implementation-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation >> X-Compile-Source-JDK: 8 >> X-Compile-Target-JDK: 8 >> Multi-Release: true >> >> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 1:21 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >> <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > All the best, this is the worst step. >> > >> > On Tue, 14 Sep, 2021, 10:47 pm Timothy Potter, <thelabd...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Building RC1 now ... stay tuned. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 2:30 PM Timothy Potter <thelabd...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Thanks for the update Mike! >> >> > >> >> > I'm backporting SOLR-15620 right now and am cooking up a quick PR for >> >> > SOLR-15621, which looks like an easy win for the issue Cassandra >> >> > reported on Slack earlier today. >> >> > >> >> > Cheers, >> >> > Tim >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 11:32 AM Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > Hi Tim, I'm still working on SOLR-15555, the code and benchmarking >> >> > > both look pretty good, but I've got a few last unit tests that I >> need >> >> > > to chase down. Hopefully taken care of by today or tomorrow, I'll >> be >> >> > > sure to keep you updated though. >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 11:39 AM Timothy Potter < >> thelabd...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > > > >> >> > > > I found https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15620 while >> testing >> >> > > > the schema designer. I haven't built the RC yet, so going to see >> if I >> >> > > > can get this in today. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 12:36 PM Timothy Potter < >> thelabd...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > NOTICE: >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Branch branch_8_10 has been cut and versions updated to 8.11 >> on stable branch. >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Please observe the normal rules: >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > * No new features may be committed to the branch. >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes >> may be >> >> > > > > committed to the branch. However, you should submit all >> patches you >> >> > > > > want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to >> review >> >> > > > > and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind that it is >> our >> >> > > > > main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible. >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be >> committed >> >> > > > > to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and >> then into >> >> > > > > the current release branch. >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > * Normal unstable and stable branch development may continue >> as usual. >> >> > > > > However, if you plan to commit a big change to the unstable >> branch >> >> > > > > while the branch feature freeze is in effect, think twice: >> can't the >> >> > > > > addition wait a couple more days? Merges of bug fixes into >> the branch >> >> > > > > may become more difficult. >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.10 and priority >> "Blocker" will delay >> >> > > > > a release candidate build. >> >> > > > > ---- >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> > > >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>
