I think Greg is right and this query is supposed to be a
specialization for a disjunction of multiple range queries. It helps
because you need to visit the index of the BKD tree and build a bit
set once for the entire disjunction instead of once per range.

I suspect that the fact that it doesn't work with multi-dimensional
points is a bug that hasn't been found yet because it's been mostly
discussed in the context of 1D fields?

On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 5:13 PM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I did a little git spelunking and found this PR
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/794 where it was
> introduced. It does sound to me as if the intent was to match on
> multiple multi-dimensional ranges (ie hypercubes), not on any
> dimension among multiple ranges? Why would anyone ever want to do
> that? On the other hand a lot of people looked at it ... so maybe
> we're missing something here?
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 11:14 AM Greg Miller <gsmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks-
> >
> > Is anyone familiar with MultiRangeQuery (found in
> > o.a.l.sandbox.search)? I was playing around with it recently since it
> > might be a good fit for a use-case I'm working on for Amazon's Product
> > Search engine, but it looks like it has a pretty fundamental bug in
> > how it works. That or I'm completely mis-understanding what the query
> > is meant to do.
> >
> > My understanding is that this query should consider documents to be a
> > match if they contain a point that is found in _any_ of the ranges
> > represented by this query (i.e., it's a disjunction over a set of
> > query ranges). But... it appears that the query incorrectly considers
> > a document to be a match if its point matches on any single dimension
> > of any range (where it should be requiring all dimensions in a
> > particular range to match).
> >
> > I added a unit test to demonstrate this bug along with a proposed fix
> > over here: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/437
> >
> > If anyone is familiar with this query (or better yet, uses it), I'd be
> > really interested in your input.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -Greg
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>


-- 
Adrien

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to