[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114259#comment-13114259
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3453:
--------------------------------------------
That sounds great!
This makes our expert APIs (direct Field/FieldType construction) much
cleaner for creating a index doc values field.
After this we can separately take up what sugar classes/methods we can
add to make it easy for non-expert users to create doc values. Maybe
static methods like NumericField.newIntValueField(17) and
BinaryField.newFixedValueField(bytes) for example...
I'll open a new issue about accidentally adding same DV field twice...
> remove IndexDocValuesField
> --------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3453
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3453
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Assignee: Chris Male
>
> Its confusing how we present CSF functionality to the user, its actually not
> a "field" but an "attribute" of a field like STORED or INDEXED.
> Otherwise, its really hard to think about CSF because there is a mismatch
> between the APIs and the index format.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
