Howdy folks, now that Lucene 9.2 has wrapped and we're past the holiday weekend in the United States, I'd like to take a look at getting this rolling by the end of the week. I see an open PR for backporting LUCENE-10236 but it doesn't look like anything else would really be waiting at the moment.
I will plan to build a release candidate on Thursday (sooner if LUCENE-10236 is committed, later if somebody else shouts that they have other issues). Thanks! On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 3:48 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > I bumped Jackson in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16213 and > also backported to 8_11. Wdyt? > > Jan > > 18. mai 2022 kl. 15:22 skrev Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com>: > > SOLR-16194 is in and ported to 8.11,.2 > > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 7:12 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > >> I was pinged on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16019 because >> I have an in-flight PR with a backport. I'll complete and merge that PR. >> >> Jan >> >> >> 13. mai 2022 kl. 01:03 skrev Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>: >> >> To: dev@lucene, dev@solr >> >> NOTICE: >> >> I am planning on preparing a bugfix release from branch branch_8_11 >> (likely mid next week) >> >> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch: >> >> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue >> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take. >> ** If you're backporting stuff this week still or over the weekend, then >> skip >> the bit about how long it will take. >> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.11.2 >> in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as >> Blocker >> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed >> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into >> the current release branch. >> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.11.2 and priority "Blocker" will >> delay >> a release candidate build. >> >> Also, please observe that since 9.0 already exists, there cannot be any >> index format breaking changes. It really should only be bug fixes that have >> already been verified on the 9x branch. >> >> Thanks, >> Mike >> >> >> > > -- > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) > http://www.the111shift.com (play) > > >
