>
> Is there anybody who kindly provides a github account to make sure that
> "any notifications are never triggered" when executing migration? I
> confirmed this with my account, just wanted to test it with other one or
> two accounts.
>

I've subscribed to all notifications for that sandbox-lucene-10557 repo.
Let me know if you are going to create a different repo and I'll subscribe
to that as well.

- Houston

On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 12:47 PM Tomoko Uchida <tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I started to play around with the (unofficial) Issue Import API
> <https://gist.github.com/jonmagic/5282384165e0f86ef105> and so far so
> good.
> - Original timestamps (created, updated) are preserved
> - An issue and its comments can be imported with one post request;
> importing is done asynchronously but the background job looks sufficiently
> fast.
> - Notifications are not triggered with mentions in the issue comments
> (e.g. https://github.com/mocobeta/sandbox-lucene-10557/issues/249)
>
> I will do more tests and rewrite the scripts with this API and if it works
> as expected, try to migrate whole Jira issues into a test repo next time;
> it still needs two-pass migration but could be done in a few hours with the
> default rate limit.
> Is there anybody who kindly provides a github account to make sure that
> "any notifications are never triggered" when executing migration? I
> confirmed this with my account, just wanted to test it with other one or
> two accounts.
>
> Tomoko
>
> 2022年6月24日(金) 21:12 Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com>:
>
>> FWIW I don't mind receiving these one-time notifications for the purpose
>> of the migration.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 12:58 PM Tomoko Uchida <
>> tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> > If you could give me some "example mail", I can add a "feed to trash"
>>> sieve rule before you start it.
>>>
>>> If we decide to migrate all Jira issues to GItHub with reporter/author
>>> account re-mapping (hyperlinks), and we still cannot find a workaround
>>> not to trigger notifications, I'll let you all know the example mail
>>> text.
>>> I can also trigger some real notifications by simulating a few
>>> migrations for people who wish to know what will happen in their
>>> mailbox/github UI beforehand. I'm really not sure what will happen to
>>> everyone by triggering so many notifications.
>>>
>>> Precisely speaking, you will receive the same number of notifications
>>> to your all activities in Jira so far: reporting an issue, assigning
>>> yourself to an issue, and leaving a comment.
>>> GitHub UI and mailers will aggregate them into "issues", I think.
>>>
>>> > Another question: With the alternative API is it possible to keep
>>> original Reporters and Authors of comments, too?
>>>
>>> I haven't tried the unofficial API yet, but as far as I read the
>>> examples, it is not possible to keep original reporters or authors.
>>> You cannot change/tweak GitHub issue reporter or author by any means -
>>> it looks a sane decision to me.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2022年6月24日(金) 16:18 Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de>:
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > Am 23.06.2022 um 19:09 schrieb Tomoko Uchida:
>>> >
>>> > uschindler,Uwe Schindler,2474
>>> >
>>> > If you could give me some "example mail", I can add a "feed to trash"
>>> sieve rule before you start it.
>>> >
>>> > We have 109158 resources (10608 issues + 98550 comments) in total.
>>> With the default rate limit of 5000 reqs per hour, it will take 22 hours if
>>> there are no failures/retries. With an enterprise account, it will take 7-8
>>> hours I think.
>>> >
>>> > So a sieve rule would be good to not get constant mail all the time,
>>> because my 2474 issues (or notifications?) will be distrubuted over the
>>> whole day.
>>> >
>>> > Another question: With the alternative API is it possible to keep
>>> original Reporters and Authors of comments, too?
>>> >
>>> > Uwe
>>> >
>>> > Tomoko
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2022年6月24日(金) 0:39 Tomoko Uchida <tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com>:
>>> >>
>>> >> It seems not new - I don't figure out why this is not published as a
>>> public API yet but according to the comments there, it could be
>>> buggy/unstable (still worth a try to me).
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> 2022年6月24日(金) 0:26 Tomoko Uchida <tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com>:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I just browsed through this article about the "import issues" API
>>> (looks pretty new and on technical preview status?)
>>> >>> https://gist.github.com/jonmagic/5282384165e0f86ef105
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Seems it solves many of our considerations - preserving original
>>> timestamp, bulk importing issue comments, and not triggering notifications.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I'll try it later; thank you Rob for providing the information.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 2022年6月23日(木) 23:18 Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com>:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> oh phew! glad to hear this was expected
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 10:17 AM Tomoko Uchida
>>> >>>> <tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > > Many comments were lost in the transfer. The last one in the
>>> copy is
>>> >>>> > > only about 1/4 of the way through this gigantic issue. This
>>> really is
>>> >>>> > > a blocker I think.
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > I limited the number of comments per issue up to ten for testing.
>>> We can migrate literally all comments - one by one.
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > Tomoko
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > 2022年6月23日(木) 23:09 Tomoko Uchida <tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com>:
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>>> >> I have little now to carefully read/respond to all replies right
>>> now, but just wanted to answer this.
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> > Will it be possible to preserve links from issues -> pull
>>> requests?
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> Yes it's a bit cumbersome (and it could be difficult to make
>>> sure that all links to PRs are covered - it's not solid metadata, you need
>>> to parse github bot's comments) but surely possible.
>>> >>>> >> See https://github.com/mocobeta/sandbox-lucene-10557/issues/188.
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> As for notifications and attachment files, if there are ways to
>>> manage these it'd be great.
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> 2022年6月23日(木) 22:59 Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com>:
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>> Interesting, thanks Rob. I see the attachments have been ported
>>> in that article as well - something the official API is not able to do.
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>> https://jira.spring.io/browse/DATACMNS-617?redirect=false
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-data-commons/issues/1080
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>> Dawid
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 3:26 PM Rob Audenaerde <
>>> rob.audenae...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> >>>> I didn't read the entire thread, so apologies if this is a
>>> duplicate:
>>> >>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> >>>> Did you check
>>> https://spring.io/blog/2021/01/07/spring-data-s-migration-from-jira-to-github-issues
>>> >>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> >>>> They especially write there is an api that doesn't trigger
>>> notifications.
>>> >>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> >>>> It is documented here:
>>> https://gist.github.com/jonmagic/5282384165e0f86ef105
>>> >>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022, 15:14 Michael Sokolov <
>>> msoko...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>> >>>>> Yes thank you! You say this is not difficult, but it looks
>>> like a big
>>> >>>> >>>>> job to me! Here are a bunch of things I noticed that we would
>>> ideally
>>> >>>> >>>>> address (from looking at one long and complex issue,
>>> LUCENE-9004). I
>>> >>>> >>>>> wouldn't be so bold as to say these should block us from
>>> proceeding if
>>> >>>> >>>>> they're not addressed, just want to point out there is
>>> potentially a
>>> >>>> >>>>> lot to do:
>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>> >>>>> Will it be possible to preserve links from issues -> pull
>>> requests?
>>> >>>> >>>>> That seems like one of the most important pieces of
>>> "metadata".
>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>> >>>>> As far as attached files go, I see you seem to have made an
>>> attempt?
>>> >>>> >>>>> There is a link in
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9004
>>> >>>> >>>>> where you had posted a picture of a graph, for example; in
>>> >>>> >>>>> https://github.com/mocobeta/sandbox-lucene-10557/issues/171
>>> it is
>>> >>>> >>>>> represented as a link. When you click on the link you get an
>>> error
>>> >>>> >>>>> though. I wonder if it would be possible to link back to the
>>> images
>>> >>>> >>>>> hosted in JIRA? (Ideally as an <IMG> tag; otherwise a link
>>> would be
>>> >>>> >>>>> good).
>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>> >>>>> I agree with Ryan - I'd be willing to bulk-delete 1000
>>> notifications
>>> >>>> >>>>> if it means preserving hyperlinks to people
>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>> >>>>> Numbered list formatting became giant bold text (see the
>>> comment
>>> >>>> >>>>> containing "Here's a strategy")
>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>> >>>>> Many comments were lost in the transfer. The last one in the
>>> copy is
>>> >>>> >>>>> only about 1/4 of the way through this gigantic issue. This
>>> really is
>>> >>>> >>>>> a blocker I think. I wonder what happened? Maybe some API
>>> calls failed
>>> >>>> >>>>> and we need to retry???
>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>> >>>>> I wanted to check other fancy formatting (tables, block
>>> comments, code
>>> >>>> >>>>> blocks, etc) but haven't looked at these yet...
>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 8:34 AM Ryan Ernst <r...@iernst.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>> >>>>> > This is great work Tomoko! A couple minor thoughts:
>>> >>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>> >>>>> > * I don’t think a flood of notifications from the import is
>>> a problem. It’s a one time hassle, and having the actual user links is nice
>>> for GitHub’s cross linking system.
>>> >>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>> >>>>> > * Do you have an estimate for how many api calls are
>>> needed? How many total issues+comments exist in jira? I assume the limits
>>> you dealt with were the default 5k requests per hour. If that will take too
>>> long, we could consider using a user from an enterprise account which has
>>> 3x the limit.
>>> >>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>> >>>>> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 15:56 Tomoko Uchida <
>>> tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>> >>>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> Hi all,
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> again - this is about GitHub migration.
>>> >>>> >>>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> We have a large disagreement on whether we should migrate
>>> existing Jira issues (including all closed issues) to GitHub or not.
>>> >>>> >>>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> I drafted a tiny migration tool [1] to see how it looks if
>>> we move Jira issues to GitHub, and tried to migrate a small portion of Jira
>>> issues/comments to a test repo. You can see it here:
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> - Closed issues list
>>> https://github.com/mocobeta/sandbox-lucene-10557/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> - Unresolved issues list:
>>> https://github.com/mocobeta/sandbox-lucene-10557/issues
>>> >>>> >>>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> I don't deserve to have a strong opinion on how we should
>>> treat 20+ years of history so I would reserve my opinion - would the
>>> prototype be of some help to have a conversation?
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> I have to leave for a while, I'd be glad if you have a
>>> talk on it while I'm away and hopefully reach an agreement.
>>> >>>> >>>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> Here's a summary of what can be done.
>>> >>>> >>>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> You can:
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> * migrate all texts in issue descriptions and comments to
>>> GitHub; browsing/searching old issues should work fine.
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> * extract every issue metadata from Jira and port it to
>>> labels or issue descriptions (as plain text).
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> * map Jira cross-issue link "LUCENE-xxx" to GitHub issue
>>> mention "#yyy".
>>> >>>> >>>>> >>    * see this example:
>>> https://github.com/mocobeta/sandbox-lucene-10557/issues/218
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> * map Jira user ids to GitHub accounts if the mapping is
>>> given.
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> * convert Jira markups to Markdown with parser library.
>>> >>>> >>>>> >>    * not perfect - there can be many conversion errors
>>> >>>> >>>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> And here are the limitations. (Please correct me if I'm
>>> missing something.)
>>> >>>> >>>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> You cannot:
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> * simulate original authors and timestamps; they have to
>>> be preserved in free-text forms.
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> * migrate attached files (patches, images, etc.) to
>>> GitHub; these have to remain in Jira.
>>> >>>> >>>>> >>    * it's not allowed to programmatically upload files and
>>> attach them to issues.
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> * create hyperlinks from issues to GitHub accounts
>>> (reporters, comment authors, etc.) by mentions; otherwise everyone will
>>> receive a huge volume of notifications.
>>> >>>> >>>>> >>    * still accounts can be noted with a markup `@xxxx`
>>> (without mentioning) in their right place
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> * "bulk" import issues/comments. Each resource has to be
>>> posted one by one. Migration would take many hours (perhaps days?) due to
>>> the severe API call rate limit.
>>> >>>> >>>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> It's not a particularly difficult task, however, there
>>> will be other uncontrollable things I haven't noticed yet.
>>> >>>> >>>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> [1]
>>> https://github.com/mocobeta/sandbox-lucene-10557/tree/main/migration
>>> >>>> >>>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>>>> >> Tomoko
>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>>>
>>> > --
>>> > Uwe Schindler
>>> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>>> > https://www.thetaphi.de
>>> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Adrien
>>
>

Reply via email to