Ahhh thanks Dawid, this makes sense.

On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 9:23 AM Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Tags seem to exist on the lucene-solr repository (
>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr) so maybe they were missed from
>> the migration when we did the Lucene/Solr split? +Dawid Weiss
>> <dawid.we...@gmail.com> I wonder if you have thoughts on this.
>>
>
> I don't think anything has been missed. Solr and Lucene had a common git
> repository up until version 8.8.1 and this tag is reflected in Lucene's
> now-current git:
>
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/tree/releases/lucene-solr/8.8.1
>
> All subsequent releases for the 8.x line have been made from the common
> repository _after the split_ - these tags only exist back in the common
> repository, they're not forward-ported to the Lucene-only repository. Those
> historical tags are there for, well, historical reasons. If you're looking
> for the exact code commit for 8.11.0, you have to look back at the
> lucene-solr repository (which is the maintenance for the 8.x line), here:
>
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/releases/lucene-solr/8.11.0
>
> Anticipating the question, I don't think it makes sense to forward-port
> commits from lucene-solr to lucene - this would only create additional
> confusion as to where the development/ maintenance actually takes place.
>
> Dawid
>
>
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 7:55 AM Shad Storhaug <s...@shadstorhaug.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I was just conversing with a user who mentioned he was using Lucene
>>> 8.11.0, but when I checked the repo there is no release with that version,
>>> it ends at 8.8.1. Then I checked on mvnrepository.com and they do
>>> exist: https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.lucene/lucene-core.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So what gives? Why were these releases not tagged in the repo? If they
>>> are tagged using a different format, please let me know what the other
>>> format is.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
>>>
>>> Project Chairperson – Apache Lucene.NET
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Adrien
>>
>

-- 
Adrien

Reply via email to