Reading Uwe's error message more carefully, I had first assumed that the GPG failure was due to the lack of an ultimately trusted signature, but it seems like it's due to "can't connect to the agent: IPC connect call failed" actually, which suggests an issue with the GPG agent?
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 3:00 PM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> wrote: > I got this message when initially downloading the artifacts: > > Downloading > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.2-RC1-rev-858d9b437047a577fa9457089afff43eefa461db/lucene/lucene-9.4.2-src.tgz.asc > File: > /tmp/smoke_lucene_9.4.2_858d9b437047a577fa9457089afff43eefa461db/lucene.lucene-9.4.2-src.tgz.gpg.verify.log > verify trust > GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted > signature! > > is it related? > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 8:43 AM Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > > > > The problem is: it is working like this since years - the 9.4.1 release > worked fine. No change! > > > > And I can't configure this because GPG uses its own home directory setup > by smoke tester (see paths below). So it should not look anywhere else? In > addition "gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found" is just a warning, it > should not cause gpg to exit. > > > > Also why does it only happens at the time of Maven? It checks signatures > before, too. This is why I restarted the build: > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/25/console (still > running) > > > > Uwe > > > > Am 18.11.2022 um 14:21 schrieb Adrien Grand: > > > > Uwe, the error message suggests that Policeman Jenkins is not ultimately > trusting any of the keys. Does it work if you configure it to ultimately > trust your "Uwe Schindler (CODE SIGNING KEY) <uschind...@apache.org>" key > (which I assume you would be ok with)? > > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 2:18 PM Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > >> > >> I am restarting the build, maybe it was some hickup. Interestingly it > only failed for the Maven dependencies. P.S.: Why does it import the key > file over and over? It would be enough to do this once at beginning of > smoker. > >> > >> Uwe > >> > >> Am 18.11.2022 um 14:12 schrieb Uwe Schindler: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I get a failure because your key is somehow rejected by GPG (Ubuntu > 22.04): > >> > >> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/24/console > >> > >> verify maven artifact sigs command "gpg --homedir > /home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Release-Tester/smoketmp/lucene.gpg --import > /home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Release-Tester/smoketmp/KEYS" failed: gpg: > keybox > '/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Release-Tester/smoketmp/lucene.gpg/pubring.kbx' > created gpg: > /home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Release-Tester/smoketmp/lucene.gpg/trustdb.gpg: > trustdb created gpg: key B83EA82A0AFCEE7C: public key "Yonik Seeley < > yo...@apache.org>" imported gpg: can't connect to the agent: IPC connect > call failed gpg: key E48025ED13E57FFC: public key "Upayavira < > u...@odoko.co.uk>" imported [...] gpg: key 051A0FAF76BC6507: public key > "Adrien Grand (CODE SIGNING KEY) <jpou...@apache.org>" imported [...] > gpg: key 32423B0E264B5CBA: public key "Julie Tibshirani (New code signing > key) <juliet...@apache.org>" imported gpg: Total number processed: 62 > gpg: imported: 62 gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found > >> It looks like for others it succeeds? No idea why. Maybe Ubuntu 22.04 > has a too-new GPG or it needs to use gpg2? > >> > >> -1 to release until this is sorted out. > >> > >> Uwe > >> > >> Am 17.11.2022 um 15:18 schrieb Adrien Grand: > >> > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.4.2 > >> > >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.2-RC1-rev-858d9b437047a577fa9457089afff43eefa461db > >> > >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > >> > >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.2-RC1-rev-858d9b437047a577fa9457089afff43eefa461db > >> > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-11-20 15:00 > UTC. > >> > >> [ ] +1 approve > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >> > >> Here is my +1. > >> > >> -- > >> Adrien > >> > >> -- > >> Uwe Schindler > >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > >> https://www.thetaphi.de > >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > >> > >> -- > >> Uwe Schindler > >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > >> https://www.thetaphi.de > >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > > > > > -- > > Adrien > > > > -- > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- Adrien
