ok, I re-ran without the pesky log4j-thingy running and
SUCCESS! [0:55:54.865250]
+1
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 5:52 PM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I ran the smoketester and had a failure. It seems related to some
> log4j hot patch script we are required to run at work which is somehow
> conflicting with the security manager? I'm killing that and trying
> again, but I wonder if this is going to cause problems at runtime as
> well? How do we enable the security manager -is it only when running
> tests?
>
> org.apache.lucene.codecs.simpletext.TestSimpleTextPostingsFormat >
> classMethod FAILED
> java.lang.AssertionError: The test or suite printed 15378 bytes to
> stdout and stderr, even though the limit was set to 8192 bytes.
> Increase the limit with @Limit, ignore it
> completely with @SuppressSysoutChecks or run with
> -Dtests.verbose=true
> at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([3E554FE0FEE122B9]:0)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleLimitSysouts.afterIfSuccessful(TestRuleLimitSysouts.java:283)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.TestRuleAdapter$1.afterIfSuccessful(TestRuleAdapter.java:36)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:37)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
> at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:390)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:850)
> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
>
> org.apache.lucene.codecs.simpletext.TestSimpleTextPostingsFormat >
> test suite's output saved to
> /tmp/smoke_lucene_9.8.0_d914b3722bd5b8ef31ccf7e8ddc638a87fd648db/unpack/lucene-9
> .8.0/lucene/codecs/build/test-results/test/outputs/OUTPUT-org.apache.lucene.codecs.simpletext.TestSimpleTextPostingsFormat.txt,
> copied below:
> 2> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
> 2> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> Method)
> 2> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> 2> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> 2> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> 2> at
> java.instrument/sun.instrument.InstrumentationImpl.loadClassAndStartAgent(InstrumentationImpl.java:513)
> 2> at
> java.instrument/sun.instrument.InstrumentationImpl.loadClassAndCallAgentmain(InstrumentationImpl.java:535)
> 2> Caused by: java.security.AccessControlException: access denied
> ("java.lang.RuntimePermission"
> "accessClassInPackage.jdk.internal.org.objectweb.asm")
> 2> at
> java.base/java.security.AccessControlContext.checkPermission(AccessControlContext.java:472)
> 2> at
> java.base/java.security.AccessController.checkPermission(AccessController.java:897)
> 2> at
> java.base/java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPermission(SecurityManager.java:322)
> 2> at
> java.base/java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPackageAccess(SecurityManager.java:1238)
> 2> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:174)
> 2> at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:527)
> 2> at Log4jHotPatch.asmVersion(Log4jHotPatch.java:71)
> 2> at Log4jHotPatch.agentmain(Log4jHotPatch.java:93)
> 2> ... 6 more
>
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 12:46 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:
> >
> > Smoke tester only
> >
> > SUCCESS! [1:22:37.441415]
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Jan
> >
> > 22. sep. 2023 kl. 07:48 skrev Patrick Zhai <zhai7...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.8.0
> >
> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.8.0-RC1-rev-d914b3722bd5b8ef31ccf7e8ddc638a87fd648db
> >
> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >
> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.8.0-RC1-rev-d914b3722bd5b8ef31ccf7e8ddc638a87fd648db
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours, as there's a weekend, the vote
> > will last until 2023-09-27 06:00 UTC.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Here is my +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
