Oh, and that the CHANGES.txt entries in e.g. 9.9.0 section match on 9.x and main branches... I think that one we have some automation to catch?
Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 5:58 AM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > > I see Chris is tagging issues that were left open after their linked PRs > were merged (thanks!). > > Is there something in our release tooling that cross-checks all the weakly > linked metadata today: Milestone marked (or more often: not) on an issue vs > commits to the respective branches vs location in Lucene's CHANGES.txt vs > open/closed issue matching the linked PRs? > > It seems like some simple automation here could catch mistakes. E.g. I'm > uncertain I properly moved all the FST related CHANGES.txt entries to the > right places. > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com >
