Hi, > On 25 Sep 2024, at 13:08, Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com> > wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 7:01 AM Chris Hegarty > <christopher.hega...@elastic.co> wrote: > > > +1 for release, unless the uncovered issue with TieredMergePolicy causes > > malfunction. > > My analysis concludes that there is no product bug here. Yeah, maybe the > policy could be a little more aggressive in its merging, but the issue that > the test runs into looks like a corner case on the boundary of what the > heuristics look for. > > https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13818#issuecomment-2371868712 > > It would be good to have Adrien or Mike confirm. > > I added a comment -- this looks like a rare corner case bug or test issue. > It should not be a 9.12.0 release blocker
Thank you Mike. Ok, so no blocker bugs found. We have some votes, not too many, but maybe enough. Last thing. Backward compat with the recently released 8.11.4. I finally managed to build the lucene-solr and generate these bw compat indices. I opened the following PR’s - one for main and one for branch_9_12: * https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13824 * https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13823 We don’t strictly need it, but the smoke testing may fail. If I can get some sanity on the PR’s, and they look sufficient, then I’m happy to respin a new RC for 9.12 - to include support for 8.11.4 ( in the amount of the version constant and test verification ) -Chris. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
