Hi, > On 4 Oct 2024, at 14:03, Luca Cavanna <java...@apache.org> wrote: > > Good point Chris, I've seen some confusion as well around the topic. > > On branch_9x, shall we remove the branch to prevent further confusion?
I just re-checked, and branch_9x has nothing in it that is not already in branch_9_12. I’ll delete branch_9x tomorrow, if there are not objections. -Chris. > Cheers > Luca > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 2:57 PM Chris Hegarty > <christopher.hega...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote: > Hi, > > Since we bumped and stabilised the main branch to 11, and also cut the > branches for 10, we can now merge changes into main as usual, and backport to > `branch_10x`. > > The last scheduled minor release in the 9 series is 9.12.0. However, the > `branch_9_12` can be used for bug fixing, if at all. Assuming that some > interested party would be willing to do a bug fix release of 9.12.x. In > general, I assume very little to be backported to 9.12.x at this point, > unless critical bugs are found in 9.12. > > The `branch_9x` will be “sunset” - no longer in use. > > -Chris. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org