Hi,

> On 4 Oct 2024, at 14:03, Luca Cavanna <java...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Good point Chris, I've seen some confusion as well around the topic.
> 
> On branch_9x, shall we remove the branch to prevent further confusion?

I just re-checked, and branch_9x has nothing in it that is not already in 
branch_9_12. 

I’ll delete branch_9x tomorrow, if there are not objections.

-Chris.


> Cheers
> Luca
> 
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 2:57 PM Chris Hegarty 
> <christopher.hega...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Since we bumped and stabilised the main branch to 11, and also cut the 
> branches for 10, we can now merge changes into main as usual, and backport to 
> `branch_10x`. 
> 
> The last scheduled minor release in the 9 series is 9.12.0. However, the 
> `branch_9_12` can be used for bug fixing, if at all. Assuming that some 
> interested party would be willing to do a bug fix release of 9.12.x. In 
> general, I assume very little to be backported to 9.12.x at this point, 
> unless critical bugs are found in 9.12.
> 
> The `branch_9x` will be “sunset” - no longer in use.
> 
> -Chris.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to