Thanks Chris. I looked at it, but failed to comprehend what's going on there. I think it would be good to document this process somewhere (unless it is documented?).
On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 5:10 PM Chris Hegarty <christopher.hega...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote: > Fixed. > > I forgot to add the next bugfix version which confused the bwc test logic. > https://github.com/apache/lucene/commit/20a34933748f30a3fcf9519724ee117837853b29 > > -Chris. > > > On 20 Jun 2025, at 22:32, Chris Hegarty <christopher.hega...@elastic.co> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I just noticed an issue with the backward compatibility tests since I > merged the indices for 9.12.2, to branch_10x. I dunno the problem yet, but > I’ll get it fixed a.s.a.p. > > > > java.lang.AssertionError: Index name 9.3.0 should not exist found > expected null, but was:<java.io.BufferedInputStream@252ff292> > >> at > __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([825390392518DBD7:F6F20709CBBC59DE]:0) > >> at junit@4.13.1/org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89) > >> at junit@4.13.1/org.junit.Assert.failNotNull(Assert.java:756) > > > > I noticed this only when I see that the GH action show that there are > some failures here: > > https://github.com/apache/lucene/commits/branch_10x > > > > > > -Chris. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
