[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13120053#comment-13120053
 ] 

sebastian L. edited comment on LUCENE-3440 at 10/4/11 2:38 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

Patch for trunk (1178632).
                
      was (Author: mdz-munich):
    Patch for trunk (1177996)
                  
> FastVectorHighlighter: IDF-weighted terms for ordered fragments 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3440
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: modules/highlighter
>    Affects Versions: 3.5, 4.0
>            Reporter: sebastian L.
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: FastVectorHighlighter
>             Fix For: 3.5, 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-4.0-SNAPSHOT-3440-7.patch, 
> weight-vs-boost_table01.html, weight-vs-boost_table02.html
>
>
> The FastVectorHighlighter uses for every term found in a fragment an equal 
> weight, which causes a higher ranking for fragments with a high number of 
> words or, in the worst case, a high number of very common words than 
> fragments that contains *all* of the terms used in the original query. 
> This patch provides ordered fragments with IDF-weighted terms: 
> total weight = total weight + IDF for unique term per fragment * boost of 
> query; 
> The ranking-formula should be the same, or at least similar, to that one used 
> in org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.QueryTermScorer.
> The patch is simple, but it works for us. 
> Some ideas:
> - A better approach would be moving the whole fragments-scoring into a 
> separate class.
> - Switch scoring via parameter 
> - Exact phrases should be given a even better score, regardless if a 
> phrase-query was executed or not
> - edismax/dismax-parameters pf, ps and pf^boost should be observed and 
> corresponding fragments should be ranked higher 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to