[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13122148#comment-13122148
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3492:
-------------------------------------
Sure, absolutely. In our (mostly algorithmic, mind you) experience even small
test cases can be randomized and then it is really duplicated effort to
re-write them for a particular bug scenario (the tests are often simple, the
data changes). But sure: the simpler the test, the better.
> Extract a generic framework for running randomized tests.
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3492
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3492
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: general/test
> Reporter: Dawid Weiss
> Assignee: Dawid Weiss
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2011-10-06 at 12.58.02 PM.png
>
>
> I love the idea of randomized testing. Everyone (we at CarrotSearch, Lucene
> and Solr folks) have their glue to make it possible. The question is if
> there's something to pull out that others could share without having the need
> to import Lucene-specific classes.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
