Inconsistent comment and code for the method "document(int n, FieldSelector
fieldSelector)" in the classes
"org.apache.lucene.index.{IndexReader,FilterIndexReader,SegmentReader}".
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: LUCENE-3570
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3570
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core/index
Affects Versions: 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0.3, 3.0.2, 3.0.1, 3.0, 2.9.4, 2.9.3
Environment: Platform Independent
Reporter: SHIN HWEI TAN
The method "document" in the "SegmentReader" and "FilterIndexReader" classes
does not check the "fieldSelector" parameter for "null", whereas the Javadoc
comment in the abstract superclass "IndexReader" explicitly states the
parameter "May be null":
/**
...
* @param fieldSelector The {@link FieldSelector} to use to determine what
* Fields should be loaded on the Document. May be null, in which case
* all Fields will be loaded.
...
*/
public abstract Document document(int n, FieldSelector fieldSelector) throws
CorruptIndexException, IOException;
Suggested Fixes:
1. Add code "if (fieldSelector == null) ..." at the beginning of the method
body in "FilterIndexReader" and "SegmentReader".
OR
2. Remove the part "May be null, in which case all Fields will be loaded" from
the comment in "IndexReader".
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
