[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159994#comment-13159994
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2280:
-----------------------------------
I also plan to add in support for the convenience methods deleteById(String id,
int commitWithinMs) etc in SolrJ the same way as for adds.
> commitWithin ignored for a delete query
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2280
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2280
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: clients - java
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: Jan Høydahl
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.6, 4.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-2280-3x.patch, SOLR-2280.patch, SOLR-2280.patch,
> SOLR-2280.patch
>
>
> The commitWithin option on an UpdateRequest is only honored for requests
> containing new documents. It does not, for example, work with a delete
> query. The following doesn't work as expected:
> {code:java}
> UpdateRequest request = new UpdateRequest();
> request.deleteById("id123");
> request.setCommitWithin(1000);
> solrServer.request(request);
> {code}
> In my opinion, the commitWithin attribute should be permitted on the
> <delete/> xml tag as well as <add/>. Such a change would go in
> XMLLoader.java and its would have some ramifications elsewhere too. Once
> this is done, then UpdateRequest.getXml() can be updated to generate the
> right XML.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
