On Feb 8, 2012, at 7:35 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > We should also consider having part of the wiki "committers only" (or > others that we decide to give access). Just as with our code > development, it doesn't always make sense to completely crowd-source > documentation.
I could see that we move "official docs" to the CMS and leave the wiki for new things, etc. and for user generated recipes, etc. I'm having a discussion on site-dev@ about how we might be able to incorporate some type of commenting system (disqus, perhaps) into the CMS so that we can have people comment on CMS pages -- assuming we put up a more coherent ref. guide there. > > -Yonik > lucidimagination.com > > > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Yonik Seeley <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Ryan had started on it some time ago, but was never completed. >> >> I thought that was maybe for the website, but not the wiki (I don't >> think we have a wiki space created yet?) >> >>> FWIW, I also think we should think about re-organizing some of our docs so >>> that it is easier for beginners >> >> +1 >> >> Specific to Solr, I think we should drop all the "back compat" in our >> documentation and target it toward 4.0 >> >> -Yonik >> lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > -------------------------------------------- Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com
