> > I mean "reproducibility bugs" where somehow a test doesn't reproduce > > because of bugs in LuceneTestCase :) > > Oh no -- the whole point of all this is so that we have 100% reproducibility > (is > there even a word like that?) or failures saying something like: "this random > shouldn't be shared and is, fix your test case named: ...".
:-) It would be great if we could ever have that, but I don’t think that’s possible! Most non-reproducibility in Lucene came from multi-threaded tests where the different threads interact with each other... And that cannot be solved in any case without serial execution. Uwe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
