[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13215124#comment-13215124 ]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-3795: --------------------------------------- bq. What is the advantage of two spatial modules? Can I run spatial queries with just base by itself? The real advantage is that client code (solrj etc) can know about Shapes/Operations without needing to include lucene. From spatial-base, you can *build* queries and understand the results; but can't run the query. I need my client code to use a real API rather then needing to build the correct String query representations and parsing results. > Replace spatial contrib module with LSP's spatial-lucene module > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-3795 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3795 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: modules/spatial > Reporter: David Smiley > Assignee: David Smiley > Fix For: 4.0 > > > I propose that Lucene's spatial contrib module be replaced with the > spatial-lucene module within Lucene Spatial Playground (LSP). LSP has been > in development for approximately 1 year by David Smiley, Ryan McKinley, and > Chris Male and we feel it is ready. LSP is here: > http://code.google.com/p/lucene-spatial-playground/ and the spatial-lucene > module is intuitively in svn/trunk/spatial-lucene/. > I'll add more comments to prevent the issue description from being too long. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org