[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13216511#comment-13216511
 ] 

Sujit Pal commented on SOLR-3163:
---------------------------------

Ok, I understand. I already have a workaround to parse the NamedList as it is, 
so I am not blocked. Just seemed inconsistent, but now I understand why. And 
for those that need it, one can probably use the json.nl=map parameter. Shall I 
close the bug?

                
> FacetComponent returns list of alternate name, value instead of map for 
> counts in JSON responses
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-3163
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3163
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SearchComponents - other
>    Affects Versions: 3.5
>            Reporter: Sujit Pal
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: facet
>
> Facet counts for facet.field come back in JSON format like this (a list of 
> name and values, where even positions are keys and odd positions are values).
> {quote}
>   "facet_counts":{
>     "facet_fields":{
>       "u_idx":[
>         "section",39663,
>         "adam",6211,
>         "image",3840,
>         "slideshow",2480],
>       ...
> {quote}
> unlike facet.query facet counts, which come back like this (a map of name 
> value pairs).
> {quote}
>     "facet_queries":{
>       "u_reviewdate:[NOW-6MONTH TO NOW]":42,
>       "u_reviewdate:[NOW-1YEAR TO NOW-6MONTHS]":1561,
>       "u_reviewdate:[NOW-2YEAR TO NOW-1YEAR]":3017,
>       "u_reviewdate:[NOW-5YEAR TO NOW-2YEAR]":1538,
>       "u_reviewdate:[NOW-100YEAR TO NOW-5YEAR]":47},
> {quote}
> This is only for wt=json. With wt=xml, the two formats look similar.
> {quote}
> <lst name="facet_queries">
>   <int name="u_reviewdate:[NOW-6MONTH TO NOW]">42</int>
>   <int name="u_reviewdate:[NOW-1YEAR TO NOW-6MONTHS]">1561</int>
>   <int name="u_reviewdate:[NOW-2YEAR TO NOW-1YEAR]">3017</int>
>   <int name="u_reviewdate:[NOW-5YEAR TO NOW-2YEAR]">1538</int>
>   <int name="u_reviewdate:[NOW-100YEAR TO NOW-5YEAR]">47</int>
> </lst>
> <lst name="facet_fields">
>   <lst name="u_idx">
>     <int name="section">39663</int>
>     <int name="adam">6211</int>
>     <int name="image">3840</int>
>     <int name="slideshow">2480</int>
>   </lst>
> {quote}
> I believe this is because of the use of NamedList for this data structure in 
> FacetCountsComponent, SimpleOrderedMap should be used instead. This will 
> produce results of facet_field counts like a map in JSON format (and keep the 
> XML output the same).
> {quote}
>   "facet_counts":{
>     "facet_fields":{
>       "u_idx":[
>         "section":39663,
>         "adam":6211,
>         "image":3840,
>         "slideshow":2480],
>       ...
> {quote}
> This makes it consistent across different kinds of facets and is easier to 
> consume on the client.
> There is the concern about backward compatibility (ie users are already 
> consuming the incorrect/inconsistent format so we can't change it), but if 
> that is not as important as consistency and ease of use, then I can supply a 
> patch for this.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to