[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13217382#comment-13217382
 ] 

Hoss Man commented on SOLR-3161:
--------------------------------

-0

1) there are plenty of people who are happily using "qt" to dynamicly pick 
their request handler who don't care about securing their solr instances -- we 
shouldn't break things for them if we can avoid it.

2) assuming qt should be allowed only if it is an instance of 
solr.SearchHandler seems narrow minded to me -- it puts a totally arbitrary 
limitation on the ability for people to have their own request handlers that 
are treated as "first class citizens" and seems just as likely to lead to 
suprise and frustration as it is to appreciation for the "safety" of the 
feature (not to mention it procludes perfectly safe "query" type handlers like 
MLTHnadler and AnalysisRequestHandler


if he root goal is "make solr safer for people who don't want/expect "qt" based 
requests then unless i'm overlooking something it seems like there is a far 
simpler and more straightforward solution...

a) change the example solrocnfig to use handleSelect="false"
b) remove the (long ago deprecated) SolrServlet

if handleSelect == false, then the request dispatcher won't look at "/select" 
requests at all (unless someone has a handler named "/select") and it would do 
dispatching based on the "qt" param.  currently if that's false the logic falls 
throough to the SolrServlet, but if that's been removed then the request will 
just fail.

So new users who copy the example will have only path based request handlers by 
default, and will have to go out of their way to set handleSelect=true to get 
qt based dispatching.

Bonus points: someone can write a DispatchingRequestHandler that can optionally 
be configured with some name (such as "/select") and does nothing put look for 
a "qt" param and forward to the handler with that name -- but it can have 
configuration options indicating which names are permitted (and any other names 
would be rejected)

...on the whole, compared to the original suggestion in this issue, that seems 
a lot safer for people who want safety, and a lot simpler to document.

comments? 

                
> Use of 'qt' should be restricted to searching and should not start with a '/'
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-3161
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3161
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: search, web gui
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Assignee: David Smiley
>             Fix For: 3.6, 4.0
>
>
> I haven't yet looked at the code involved for suggestions here; I'm speaking 
> based on how I think things should work and not work, based on intuitiveness 
> and security. In general I feel it is best practice to use '/' leading 
> request handler names and not use "qt", but I don't hate it enough when used 
> in limited (search-only) circumstances to propose its demise. But if someone 
> proposes its deprecation that then I am +1 for that.
> Here is my proposal:
> Solr should error if the parameter "qt" is supplied with a leading '/'. 
> (trunk only)
> Solr should only honor "qt" if the target request handler extends 
> solr.SearchHandler.
> The new admin UI should only use 'qt' when it has to. For the query screen, 
> it could present a little pop-up menu of handlers to choose from, including 
> "/select?qt=mycustom" for handlers that aren't named with a leading '/'. This 
> choice should be positioned at the top.
> And before I forget, me or someone should investigate if there are any 
> similar security problems with the shards.qt parameter. Perhaps shards.qt can 
> abide by the same rules outlined above.
> Does anyone foresee any problems with this proposal?
> On a related subject, I think the notion of a default request handler is bad 
> - the default="true" thing. Honestly I'm not sure what it does, since I 
> noticed Solr trunk redirects '/solr/' to the new admin UI at '/solr/#/'. 
> Assuming it doesn't do anything useful anymore, I think it would be clearer 
> to use <requestHandler name="/select" class="solr.SearchHandler"> instead of 
> what's there now. The delta is to put the leading '/' on this request handler 
> name, and remove the "default" attribute.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to